Appellant / Complainant
Maya Mishra
Respondent
Lekhraj Builders, Presiding Officer Lekhraj Builders
lekhraj builders
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126003912022 by Maya Mishra against Lekhraj Builders, Presiding Officer Lekhraj Builders before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the respondent's project is not registered with U.P. RERA, rendering the Act of 2016 inapplicable per the Supreme Court's ruling in M/S Newtech Promoters & Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued fresh notice to the respondent and directed the appellant's counsel to serve the notice, application for condonation of delay, and memo of appeal via speed post and email.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week's time to file an affidavit of service and rescheduled the defective appeal for hearing on 07.04.2022.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding the delayed appeal and provided specific procedural instructions for service of notice and filing of pleadings before the next hearing on 22.03.2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126003912022-06-05-2022
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the respondent's project is not registered with U.P. RERA, rendering the Act of 2016 inapplicable per the Supreme Court's ruling in M/S Newtech Promoters & Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the respondent's project is not registered with U.P. RERA, rendering the Act of 2016 inapplicable per the Supreme Court's ruling in M/S Newtech Promoters & Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the respondent's project is not registered with U.P. RERA, rendering the Act of 2016 inapplicable per the Supreme Court's ruling in M/S Newtech Promoters & Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Jagdamba Prasad Mishra
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the respondent's project is not registered with U.P. RERA, rendering the Act of 2016 inapplicable per the Supreme Court's ruling in M/S Newtech Promoters & Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P.
Need to research all rulings for lekhraj builders?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.