Appellant / Complainant
Tripathi Sudhakar Bhai
Respondent
U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad
u.p. avas evam vikas parishad
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126003832019 by Tripathi Sudhakar Bhai against U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad before up_rera.
Hearing
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to withdraw the miscellaneous case, dismissing it as withdrawn with liberty for the appellant to approach an appropriate forum in accordance with law.
Hearing
The Tribunal has scheduled the case for orders or hearing on November 3, 2023.
For Order
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant and their counsel.
For Order
The Tribunal noted the absence of the appellant's counsel and scheduled the case for 09.08.2023 to consider the application for condonation of delay and proceed with the hearing.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel 10 days to study the case brief and scheduled the matter for orders/hearing on 29.05.2023.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to his absence from the station and rescheduled the case for hearing on 06.04.2023.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the case for further orders on 02.02.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal adjourned the case due to the absence of the applicant and scheduled it for further orders on 21.11.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal adjourned the matter and scheduled the appeal for further arguments on 21.10.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal adjourned the case in the interest of justice and scheduled it for further orders on 22.09.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal adjourned the case upon a joint request from both parties and scheduled it for 25.08.2022 to address the application for condonation of delay.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the Registry to list this case before Bench No. 2 on 13.07.2022 to be heard alongside Appeal No. 336/2019, in which judgment has already been reserved.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request for an adjournment to allow senior counsel to argue the case and rescheduled the hearing for 08.07.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the matter upon the request of the learned counsels for both parties and scheduled the case for further orders on 28.04.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the matter and scheduled it for a final hearing on February 7, 2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant's request for an adjournment due to personal difficulty and rescheduled the hearing for January 10, 2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for hearing on 14.12.2021, noting that pleadings have been exchanged and directing it to be heard alongside Appeal No. 336/2019.
Hearing
The Tribunal ordered the case to be listed on 22.11.2021 along with Appeal No. 336/2019.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment request from the appellant's counsel and directed both parties to exchange pleadings and file originals with the Registry before the next hearing on 09.11.2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal ordered that Misc. Case-642/2019 be listed along with the record of Appeal No. 336/2019 on 20.04.2021.
Hearing
The case is adjourned because lawyers are abstaining from work due to a call by the Oudh Bar Association; it is rescheduled for hearing on 23.03.2021.
For Order
The Tribunal ordered the listing of Misc. Case-642/2019 along with Appeal No. 336 of 2019 on 02.03.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126003832019-09-08-2023
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant and their counsel.
Tribunal Order #0901126003832019-08-07-2022
The Tribunal directed the Registry to list this case before Bench No. 2 on 13.07.2022 to be heard alongside Appeal No. 336/2019, in which judgment has already been reserved.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant and their counsel. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant and their counsel.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- N A
- Arjun Krishna
Respondent Advocate(s)
- N N Pandey
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant and their counsel.
The Tribunal directed the Registry to list this case before Bench No. 2 on 13.07.2022 to be heard alongside Appeal No. 336/2019, in which judgment has already been reserved.
Need to research all rulings for u.p. avas evam vikas parishad?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.