Appellant / Complainant
Mala Sharma
Respondent
Shipra Estate Limited
shipra estate limited
₹8,50,000
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126003752021 by Mala Sharma against Shipra Estate Limited before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, ruling that the appellants do not qualify as 'allottees' under Section 2(d) of the Act 2016 and that complaints are not maintainable for violations of the Act if the project is not registered.
Hearing
The Tribunal heard arguments from both parties regarding Appeal-55/2021 and subsequently reserved the judgment for delivery.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay, permitting the 7-day delay in filing the appeal and directing the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, with a subsequent week allowed for the applicants to file a reply.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent two weeks to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and grounds of appeal, with subsequent timelines set for replies and filing.
Tribunal Order #0901126003752021-17-09-2021
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay, permitting the 7-day delay in filing the appeal and directing the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126003752021-11-03-2022
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, ruling that the appellants do not qualify as 'allottees' under Section 2(d) of the Act 2016 and that complaints are not maintainable for violations of the Act if the project is not registered.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, ruling that the appellants do not qualify as 'allottees' under Section 2(d) of the Act 2016 and that complaints are not maintainable for violations of the Act if the project is not registered. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, ruling that the appellants do not qualify as 'allottees' under Section 2(d) of the Act 2016 and that complaints are not maintainable for violations of the Act if the project is not registered.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Vijeta Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Alok Kumar Srivastava
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay, permitting the 7-day delay in filing the appeal and directing the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, ruling that the appellants do not qualify as 'allottees' under Section 2(d) of the Act 2016 and that complaints are not maintainable for violations of the Act if the project is not registered.
Need to research all rulings for shipra estate limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.