up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126003692022

Appellant / Complainant

Suman Yadav

VS

Respondent

Kanpur Development Authority

Disputed Amount

11,66,250

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestUnfair Cancellation & ForfeitureJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

18 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126003692022 by Suman Yadav against Kanpur Development Authority before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestUnfair Cancellation & ForfeitureJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 131/05/2023

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and remanded the matter back for fresh adjudication, ruling that the project was delayed and that one-sided contractual terms regarding registration forfeiture are unenforceable under the RERA Act 2016.

3
Stage 228/02/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal heard arguments regarding an appeal against a Regulatory Authority order concerning the refund of registration amounts and forfeiture clauses; however, the judgment has been reserved.

4
Stage 327/01/2023

Hearing

No text available.

5
Stage 416/12/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal noted that the appellant declined to file a replication/rejoinder and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 27.01.2023.

6
Stage 523/11/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant a final opportunity to file a replication/rejoinder against the respondent's reply and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 16.12.2022.

7
Stage 601/11/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the case for further orders on 23.11.2022.

8
Stage 726/09/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant time to file a replication/rejoinder to the respondent's reply and scheduled the next hearing for November 1, 2022.

9
Stage 826/08/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant permission to file a replication/rejoinder to the respondent's reply and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 26.09.2022.

10
Stage 918/07/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant time to file a replication or rejoinder against the respondent's reply and scheduled the case for hearing on 26.08.2022.

11
Stage 1009/05/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a replication to the respondent's objections before the next hearing and ordered the registry to convert the matter into a Regular Appeal.

12
Stage 1101/04/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal condoned a 128-day delay in filing the appeal, citing Supreme Court relaxations due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and directed the Registry to register the appeal as regular.

13
Stage 1209/03/2022

Defect Removal

The Tribunal directed the issuance of notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay and outlined the procedural requirements for service of documents by the appellant.

14
Stage 1324/02/2022

Defect Removal

The Tribunal granted the appellant three days to rectify registry defects and scheduled the defective appeal for a hearing on 09.03.2022.

15
Stage 14Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126003692022-31-05-2023

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and remanded the matter back for fresh adjudication, ruling that the project was delayed and that one-sided contractual terms regarding registration forfeiture are unenforceable under the RERA Act 2016.

16
Stage 15Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126003692022-28-02-2023

The Tribunal heard arguments regarding an appeal against a Regulatory Authority order concerning the refund of registration amounts and forfeiture clauses; however, the judgment has been reserved.

17
Stage 16Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126003692022-01-04-2022

The Tribunal condoned a 128-day delay in filing the appeal, citing Supreme Court relaxations due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and directed the Registry to register the appeal as regular.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and remanded the matter back for fresh adjudication, ruling that the project was delayed and that one-sided contractual terms regarding registration forfeiture are unenforceable under the RERA Act 2016. Awarded in favor of Appellant.

Disposal Winner: AppellantStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and remanded the matter back for fresh adjudication, ruling that the project was delayed and that one-sided contractual terms regarding registration forfeiture are unenforceable under the RERA Act 2016.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 11(5)Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Samrat Vaish
  • Kaviya Singh

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Bhupendra Singh

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126003692022-31-05-2023

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and remanded the matter back for fresh adjudication, ruling that the project was delayed and that one-sided contractual terms regarding registration forfeiture are unenforceable under the RERA Act 2016.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126003692022-28-02-2023

The Tribunal heard arguments regarding an appeal against a Regulatory Authority order concerning the refund of registration amounts and forfeiture clauses; however, the judgment has been reserved.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126003692022-01-04-2022

The Tribunal condoned a 128-day delay in filing the appeal, citing Supreme Court relaxations due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and directed the Registry to register the appeal as regular.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for a builder?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →