Appellant / Complainant
Zobair Ahmad
Respondent
V.A. Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
v.a. infrastructure pvt. ltd.
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126003502019 by Zobair Ahmad against V.A. Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. before up_rera.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the respondent's project was not registered with RERA, rendering the complaint and appeal non-maintainable under the Supreme Court's ruling in M/S Newtech Promoters & Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to medical exigency and rescheduled the hearing for 03.08.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 22.07.2022 because no parties appeared and the counsel for the appellant was on sanctioned leave.
Hearing on Recall App
The Tribunal noted that the appellant has filed a replication/rejoinder to the respondent's reply and scheduled the case for hearing on 12.05.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to a medical emergency and directed the parties to exchange pleadings in the interim.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent an extension of time to file a reply to the grounds of appeal and directed that the reply be uploaded to the e-portal and emailed to the applicant's counsel.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal allowed the respondent's application to recall an ex-parte order dated 14.02.2020, subject to a cost of Rs. 15,000, and granted the respondent a final opportunity to file a reply to the appeal.
Hearing
The Tribunal rejected the respondent's recall application dated 17.03.2021 at their request and granted permission to file a new recall application within one week.
Further Order
The Tribunal directed the Registry to rectify a clerical error regarding an application number and counsel name, and granted the appellant one week to submit documents proving the project's location within Greater Noida.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the matter and directed the appellant's counsel to submit a list of dates, events, and relied-upon cases before the next hearing scheduled for 01.11.2021.
For Order
The Tribunal granted a request by the appellant's counsel to adjourn the matter and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 24.03.2021.
Hearing on Appeal
The Tribunal granted a request from the respondent's counsel to adjourn the appeal and rescheduled the matter for hearing on 09.03.2021.
Hearing on Appeal
The Tribunal directed the appellant to serve the appeal via email and ordered the respondent to file their vakalatnama and reply within specified timeframes before the next hearing on 17.02.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126003502019-03-08-2022
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the respondent's project was not registered with RERA, rendering the complaint and appeal non-maintainable under the Supreme Court's ruling in M/S Newtech Promoters & Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P.
Tribunal Order #0901126003502019-09-12-2021
The Tribunal allowed the respondent's application to recall an ex-parte order dated 14.02.2020, subject to a cost of Rs. 15,000, and granted the respondent a final opportunity to file a reply to the appeal.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the respondent's project was not registered with RERA, rendering the complaint and appeal non-maintainable under the Supreme Court's ruling in M/S Newtech Promoters & Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the respondent's project was not registered with RERA, rendering the complaint and appeal non-maintainable under the Supreme Court's ruling in M/S Newtech Promoters & Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Azhar Ikram
- Manish Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Amita Yadav
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the respondent's project was not registered with RERA, rendering the complaint and appeal non-maintainable under the Supreme Court's ruling in M/S Newtech Promoters & Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P.
The Tribunal allowed the respondent's application to recall an ex-parte order dated 14.02.2020, subject to a cost of Rs. 15,000, and granted the respondent a final opportunity to file a reply to the appeal.
Need to research all rulings for v.a. infrastructure pvt. ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.