Appellant / Complainant
Snoesh Kumar Singh
Respondent
Ansal Hi-Tech Township Ltd.
ansal hi-tech township ltd.
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126003492019 by Snoesh Kumar Singh against Ansal Hi-Tech Township Ltd. before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the project in question is unregistered, citing Supreme Court precedent that neither a complaint before the Authority nor an appeal before the Tribunal is maintainable for unregistered projects.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a final adjournment to the respondent but simultaneously closed their opportunity to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and grounds of appeal due to repeated delays. The matter is scheduled for hearing on 25.07.2022, with a strict directive that no further adjournments will be granted.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the case to 04.07.2022 due to the absence of the applicant.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 26.04.2022 for the disposal of a limitation application and any corresponding objections.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and grounds of appeal within 10 days, with a subsequent reply due from the applicant within one week.
Further Order
The Tribunal noted the absence of the applicant and directed both parties to appear on the next scheduled date, 11.01.2022, for further orders.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal allowed an adjournment application submitted by the respondent and rescheduled the case to 08.12.2021 for the disposal of a limitation application.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment to allow the appellant's senior counsel to argue the matter and rescheduled the hearing to 16.11.2021, while directing parties to exchange pleadings.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final opportunity to file an objection to the limitation application and scheduled the matter for hearing on 25.10.2021.
For Order
The Tribunal granted a final opportunity to the respondent's counsel to argue on the limitation application, warning that failure to appear on the next date will result in an order being passed based on existing records.
Tribunal Order #0901126003492019-25-07-2022
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the project in question is unregistered, citing Supreme Court precedent that neither a complaint before the Authority nor an appeal before the Tribunal is maintainable for unregistered projects.
Tribunal Order #0901126003492019-05-02-2021
The Tribunal granted a final opportunity to the respondent's counsel to argue on the limitation application, warning that failure to appear on the next date will result in an order being passed based on existing records.
Tribunal Order #0901126003492019-04-07-2022
The Tribunal granted a final adjournment to the respondent but simultaneously closed their opportunity to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and grounds of appeal due to repeated delays. The matter is scheduled for hearing on 25.07.2022, with a strict directive that no further adjournments will be granted.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the project in question is unregistered, citing Supreme Court precedent that neither a complaint before the Authority nor an appeal before the Tribunal is maintainable for unregistered projects. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the project in question is unregistered, citing Supreme Court precedent that neither a complaint before the Authority nor an appeal before the Tribunal is maintainable for unregistered projects.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Shubham Tripathi
- Harpreet Singth
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Anurag Singh
- Manoj Kumar
- Shreya Mehrotra
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the project in question is unregistered, citing Supreme Court precedent that neither a complaint before the Authority nor an appeal before the Tribunal is maintainable for unregistered projects.
The Tribunal granted a final opportunity to the respondent's counsel to argue on the limitation application, warning that failure to appear on the next date will result in an order being passed based on existing records.
The Tribunal granted a final adjournment to the respondent but simultaneously closed their opportunity to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and grounds of appeal due to repeated delays. The matter is scheduled for hearing on 25.07.2022, with a strict directive that no further adjournments will be granted.
Need to research all rulings for ansal hi-tech township ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.