Appellant / Complainant
Mudit Agarwal, Bharti Agarwal, Varsha Agarwal
Respondent
Sunworld Residency Private Limited
sunworld residency private limited
Appellant
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126003452021 by Mudit Agarwal, Bharti Agarwal, Varsha Agarwal against Sunworld Residency Private Limited before up_rera.
Hearing
The Tribunal disposed of the appeal in terms of a settlement deed reached between the appellant and respondents, ensuring that bank dues are paid to ICICI Bank as per the agreement.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a short adjournment to allow the parties to complete formalities regarding an ongoing settlement between the appellant and respondents.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 30.09.2022 following settlement proposals made by Respondent No. 1 to pay Rs. 70 lacs to ICICI Bank and Rs. 20 lacs to the Appellant upon disposal of the flat.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed Respondent No. 1 to submit a written settlement proposal to Respondent No. 2 and instructed Respondent No. 2 to provide any applicable RBI guidelines regarding such settlements.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that the parties are likely to settle the matter out of court and adjourned the appeal to 31.08.2022 for further orders.
Hearing
The Tribunal set aside an ex-parte order against Respondent No. 1 and disposed of the interim relief prayer after parties agreed to attempt an amicable settlement regarding loan foreclosure and interest rates within 15 days.
For Order
The Tribunal directed the counsel for Respondent No. 1 to file a recall application regarding an ex-parte order and scheduled the matter for July 13, 2022, to address the interim relief request.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal directed the counsel for ICICI Bank (Respondent No. 2) to produce relevant legal provisions regarding its authority to auction the flat under the SARFAESI Act, 2002, and ordered that the case proceed ex-parte against Respondent No. 1 due to non-appearance.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent's counsel to file and upload their reply on the e-portal today and serve a copy to the appellant due to previous technical difficulties.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted Respondent No. 2 (ICICI Bank) a final opportunity to file its reply within three days and scheduled the matter for hearing on July 4, 2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to implead ICICI Bank as a proforma party to the appeal and directed the appellant to amend the appeal within three days.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 18.04.2022 for the disposal of an impleadment application seeking to add ICICI Bank Ltd. as a respondent and the respondent's subsequent objection.
Final Hearing
The matter was heard via video conferencing, and the Tribunal directed that the appeal be listed for final hearing.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted ICICI Bank Ltd. one week to file its Vakalatnama and objections to the impleadment application, with subsequent directions for filing replies and uploading documents on the e-portal.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal allowed an application to implead ICICI Bank Limited as respondent no. 2 and directed the issuance of notice to the bank, returnable on 20.12.2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant three days to file a physical copy of an application for the impleadment of ICICI Bank and scheduled the matter for consideration on 24.11.2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to implead ICICI Bank as a party to the proceedings due to the existence of a tripartite agreement involving the bank.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for 21.10.2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to his unavailability in the High Court and rescheduled the matter for 28.09.2021.
Defect Removal
The matter was adjourned due to a lawyers' strike called by the Oudh Bar Association, with the case rescheduled for April 1, 2021.
For Order
The Tribunal directed the Registry to rectify clerical defects, record counsel names, and locate filed objections, while granting the appellant one week to file a reply.
For Order
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file objections within 15 days and instructed the appellant to remove registry defects and file a reply accordingly.
Tribunal Order #0901126003452021-31-08-2022
The Tribunal directed Respondent No. 1 to submit a written settlement proposal to Respondent No. 2 and instructed Respondent No. 2 to provide any applicable RBI guidelines regarding such settlements.
Tribunal Order #0901126003452021-08-07-2022
The Tribunal directed the counsel for ICICI Bank (Respondent No. 2) to produce relevant legal provisions regarding its authority to auction the flat under the SARFAESI Act, 2002, and ordered that the case proceed ex-parte against Respondent No. 1 due to non-appearance.
Tribunal Order #0901126003452021-23-12-2022
The Tribunal disposed of the appeal in terms of a settlement deed reached between the appellant and respondents, ensuring that bank dues are paid to ICICI Bank as per the agreement.
Tribunal Order #0901126003452021-13-07-2022
The Tribunal set aside an ex-parte order against Respondent No. 1 and disposed of the interim relief prayer after parties agreed to attempt an amicable settlement regarding loan foreclosure and interest rates within 15 days.
Tribunal Order #0901126003452021-18-04-2022
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to implead ICICI Bank as a proforma party to the appeal and directed the appellant to amend the appeal within three days.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal disposed of the appeal in terms of a settlement deed reached between the appellant and respondents, ensuring that bank dues are paid to ICICI Bank as per the agreement. Awarded in favor of Appellant.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal disposed of the appeal in terms of a settlement deed reached between the appellant and respondents, ensuring that bank dues are paid to ICICI Bank as per the agreement.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Abhinav Singh
- Shashank Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Raj Singh
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (5)
The Tribunal directed Respondent No. 1 to submit a written settlement proposal to Respondent No. 2 and instructed Respondent No. 2 to provide any applicable RBI guidelines regarding such settlements.
The Tribunal directed the counsel for ICICI Bank (Respondent No. 2) to produce relevant legal provisions regarding its authority to auction the flat under the SARFAESI Act, 2002, and ordered that the case proceed ex-parte against Respondent No. 1 due to non-appearance.
The Tribunal disposed of the appeal in terms of a settlement deed reached between the appellant and respondents, ensuring that bank dues are paid to ICICI Bank as per the agreement.
The Tribunal set aside an ex-parte order against Respondent No. 1 and disposed of the interim relief prayer after parties agreed to attempt an amicable settlement regarding loan foreclosure and interest rates within 15 days.
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to implead ICICI Bank as a proforma party to the appeal and directed the appellant to amend the appeal within three days.
Need to research all rulings for sunworld residency private limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.