up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126003452019

Appellant / Complainant

Faisal Anis

VS

Respondent

La Residentia Developers Pvt. Ltd.

Developer Firm

la residentia developers pvt. ltd.

Disputed Amount

32,96,840

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestSale Deed & Title TransferPromotional Misrepresentation

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

32 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126003452019 by Faisal Anis against La Residentia Developers Pvt. Ltd. before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestSale Deed & Title TransferPromotional Misrepresentation
2
Stage 129/05/2023

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by allottees, ruling that RERA does not have the jurisdiction to adjudicate independent commercial arrangements such as Pre-EMI subvention schemes or assured returns, while upholding the Regulatory Authority's order regarding possession and delay interest.

3
Stage 225/05/2023

for delivery of Judgment/Order

No text available.

4
Stage 318/04/2023

Final Hearing

The Tribunal heard arguments regarding whether the Regulatory Authority has jurisdiction to address issues concerning 'Pre-EMI' payments under a subvention plan and whether such disputes fall within the ambit of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

5
Stage 414/03/2023

Final Hearing

The tribunal granted an adjournment request made on behalf of the appellant's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the hearing for 18.04.2023.

6
Stage 503/02/2023

Final Hearing

No text available.

7
Stage 620/12/2022

Final Hearing

The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on February 3, 2023.

8
Stage 725/11/2022

Final Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal upon joint request from the counsels of both parties and scheduled the matter for hearing on 20.12.2022.

9
Stage 819/11/2022

Final Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 25.11.2022 for hearing after the appellant's counsel requested an adjournment to allow their senior to argue.

10
Stage 921/10/2022

Exchange of pleadings

The Tribunal allowed the respondent's adjournment application but imposed a cost of Rs 2000/- payable to the appellant's counsel due to the late filing of the application and unnecessary travel by the appellant's counsel.

11
Stage 1020/09/2022

Exchange of pleadings

The Tribunal directed the respondent to file a copy of a relevant Supreme Court judgment and scheduled the appeal for further orders on 21.10.2022.

12
Stage 1124/08/2022

Hearing

No text available.

13
Stage 1228/07/2022

Hearing

No text available.

14
Stage 1323/05/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal directed both parties to exchange a list of dates, events, and cited case law via email at least seven days before the next hearing on 28.07.2022.

15
Stage 1418/04/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal noted that the respondent had been granted a final opportunity to file a reply to the grounds of appeal during the previous listing.

16
Stage 1524/02/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent due to personal reasons and scheduled the next hearing for April 18, 2022, providing a final opportunity for the respondent to file a reply.

17
Stage 1613/01/2022

Hearing

No text available.

18
Stage 1723/12/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a 10-day extension to the respondent to file objections due to counsel's illness and directed both parties to upload pleadings to the e-portal before the next hearing on 13.01.2022.

19
Stage 1826/11/2021

Hearing

No text available.

20
Stage 1907/10/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal condoned a 61-day delay in filing the appeal, noting that the applicant had previously sought a review which was no longer possible due to legislative changes, and directed the respondent to file a reply.

21
Stage 2010/09/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 07.10.2021 and directed the applicant's counsel to appear in proper dress in future proceedings.

22
Stage 2106/05/2021

For Order

No text available.

23
Stage 2209/04/2021

For Order

No text available.

24
Stage 2319/03/2021

Delay condonation

No text available.

25
Stage 2419/02/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the applicant a 10-day extension to file a better affidavit for condonation of delay and set procedural timelines for service and filing of replies before the next hearing on 19.03.2021.

26
Stage 2518/01/2021

Further Order

No text available.

27
Stage 2622/10/2020

Further Order

No text available.

28
Stage 27Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126003452019-29-05-2023

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by allottees, ruling that RERA does not have the jurisdiction to adjudicate independent commercial arrangements such as Pre-EMI subvention schemes or assured returns, while upholding the Regulatory Authority's order regarding possession and delay interest.

29
Stage 28Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126003452019-18-04-2023

The Tribunal heard arguments regarding whether the Regulatory Authority has jurisdiction to address issues concerning 'Pre-EMI' payments under a subvention plan and whether such disputes fall within the ambit of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

30
Stage 29Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126003452019-21-10-2022

The Tribunal allowed the respondent's adjournment application but imposed a cost of Rs 2000/- payable to the appellant's counsel due to the late filing of the application and unnecessary travel by the appellant's counsel.

31
Stage 30Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126003452019-07-10-2021

The Tribunal condoned a 61-day delay in filing the appeal, noting that the applicant had previously sought a review which was no longer possible due to legislative changes, and directed the respondent to file a reply.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by allottees, ruling that RERA does not have the jurisdiction to adjudicate independent commercial arrangements such as Pre-EMI subvention schemes or assured returns, while upholding the Regulatory Authority's order regarding possession and delay interest. Awarded in favor of Respondent. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1%.

Disposal Winner: RespondentInterest Rate: MCLR+1%Status: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by allottees, ruling that RERA does not have the jurisdiction to adjudicate independent commercial arrangements such as Pre-EMI subvention schemes or assured returns, while upholding the Regulatory Authority's order regarding possession and delay interest.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR+1%

Interest Period

from 01.05.2016 till the date of issuance of demand letter along with OC/CC

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 11(4)(f)Section 17Section 12

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Vivek Kumar Rai

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Harish Pandey

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (4)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126003452019-29-05-2023

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by allottees, ruling that RERA does not have the jurisdiction to adjudicate independent commercial arrangements such as Pre-EMI subvention schemes or assured returns, while upholding the Regulatory Authority's order regarding possession and delay interest.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126003452019-18-04-2023

The Tribunal heard arguments regarding whether the Regulatory Authority has jurisdiction to address issues concerning 'Pre-EMI' payments under a subvention plan and whether such disputes fall within the ambit of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126003452019-21-10-2022

The Tribunal allowed the respondent's adjournment application but imposed a cost of Rs 2000/- payable to the appellant's counsel due to the late filing of the application and unnecessary travel by the appellant's counsel.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126003452019-07-10-2021

The Tribunal condoned a 61-day delay in filing the appeal, noting that the applicant had previously sought a review which was no longer possible due to legislative changes, and directed the respondent to file a reply.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for la residentia developers pvt. ltd.?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →