Appellant / Complainant
Arun Kumar Dwivedi
Respondent
U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad
₹8,16,607
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126003402019 by Arun Kumar Dwivedi against U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad before up_rera.
Hearing
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal and upheld the Regulatory Authority's order, ruling that the developer was entitled to charge for increased super area and cost escalation within the 20% limit stipulated in the project's registration booklet.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for a hearing on 22.11.2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed both parties to file and exchange a list of dates, events, and relied-upon cases within 10 days and scheduled the matter for further orders on 09.11.2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the parties to submit a list of dates, events, and relied-upon judgments to the Registry at least three days before the next hearing, scheduled for 21.09.2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal rectified a clerical error regarding the hearing date and directed the appellant to file a rejoinder/replication on the e-portal and in physical copy within 15 days.
Tribunal Order #0901126003402019-22-11-2021
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal and upheld the Regulatory Authority's order, ruling that the developer was entitled to charge for increased super area and cost escalation within the 20% limit stipulated in the project's registration booklet.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal and upheld the Regulatory Authority's order, ruling that the developer was entitled to charge for increased super area and cost escalation within the 20% limit stipulated in the project's registration booklet. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal and upheld the Regulatory Authority's order, ruling that the developer was entitled to charge for increased super area and cost escalation within the 20% limit stipulated in the project's registration booklet.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Tanay Hazari
Respondent Advocate(s)
- N N Pandey
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal and upheld the Regulatory Authority's order, ruling that the developer was entitled to charge for increased super area and cost escalation within the 20% limit stipulated in the project's registration booklet.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.