Appellant / Complainant
Ahmad Haris Jamil
Respondent
Grahlaxmi Sahkari Awas Samiti Ltd.
grahlaxmi sahkari awas samiti ltd.
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126003212019 by Ahmad Haris Jamil against Grahlaxmi Sahkari Awas Samiti Ltd. before up_rera.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as not maintainable because the respondent's project was not registered with RERA, citing Supreme Court precedent regarding the retroactive application of the Act to ongoing projects.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal due to the absence of the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for August 2, 2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file written arguments along with relied-upon judgments and scheduled the matter for hearing on 26.07.2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal directed both parties to file and exchange written submissions along with relied-upon judgments within 20 days and scheduled the matter for hearing on 17.05.2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the case due to the absence of both parties and rescheduled the hearing for April 13, 2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to clarify the legality of PLC charges and ensure escalation charges do not exceed 5%, with instructions to revise any discrepancies in the final demand and submit it to the appellant.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal noted the respondent's compliance with a previous order and directed the appellant to file a response to the papers submitted by the respondent. The matter is scheduled for further orders on 03.01.2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent's counsel to comply with a previous order dated 15.11.2021 and scheduled the appeal for further orders on 21.12.2021.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent a one-week extension to comply with a previous order regarding the rectification of dues, noting that failure to comply would require the President of the respondent organization to appear personally.
Hearing
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to amend the prayer clause and directed the respondent to examine discrepancies regarding interest calculations, amenity charges, and unauthorized PLC charges for rectification.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant permission to file an amendment application for the prayer clause and directed both parties to exchange proposed amendments and objections via email before the next hearing on 28.10.2020.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted parties time to exchange documents and objections via email and e-portal, scheduling the next hearing for October 1, 2021.
For Order
The Tribunal granted a one-week extension to the appellant's counsel to ensure compliance with a previous order dated 21.01.2021 and scheduled the next hearing for 06.04.2021.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to illness and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 16.03.2021.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent a one-week extension to file a response regarding a previous query and scheduled the next hearing for 23.02.2021.
Further Order
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file records regarding actions taken following a previous Regulatory Authority order, including details of demands against the appellant and adjustments for project delays.
Tribunal Order #0901126003212019-02-08-2022
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as not maintainable because the respondent's project was not registered with RERA, citing Supreme Court precedent regarding the retroactive application of the Act to ongoing projects.
Tribunal Order #0901126003212019-28-10-2021
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to amend the prayer clause and directed the respondent to examine discrepancies regarding interest calculations, amenity charges, and unauthorized PLC charges for rectification.
Tribunal Order #0901126003212019-21-01-2021
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file records regarding actions taken following a previous Regulatory Authority order, including details of demands against the appellant and adjustments for project delays.
Tribunal Order #0901126003212019-03-01-2022
The Tribunal directed the respondent to clarify the legality of PLC charges and ensure escalation charges do not exceed 5%, with instructions to revise any discrepancies in the final demand and submit it to the appellant.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as not maintainable because the respondent's project was not registered with RERA, citing Supreme Court precedent regarding the retroactive application of the Act to ongoing projects. Awarded in favor of Respondent. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1%.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as not maintainable because the respondent's project was not registered with RERA, citing Supreme Court precedent regarding the retroactive application of the Act to ongoing projects.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR+1%
Interest Period
delay up to 30.04.2016 and thereafter from 01.05.2016 till receipt of the Occupancy Certificate
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Ali Jibran
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Shailender Singh
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (4)
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as not maintainable because the respondent's project was not registered with RERA, citing Supreme Court precedent regarding the retroactive application of the Act to ongoing projects.
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to amend the prayer clause and directed the respondent to examine discrepancies regarding interest calculations, amenity charges, and unauthorized PLC charges for rectification.
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file records regarding actions taken following a previous Regulatory Authority order, including details of demands against the appellant and adjustments for project delays.
The Tribunal directed the respondent to clarify the legality of PLC charges and ensure escalation charges do not exceed 5%, with instructions to revise any discrepancies in the final demand and submit it to the appellant.
Need to research all rulings for grahlaxmi sahkari awas samiti ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.