up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126003192019

Appellant / Complainant

Kunveer Jeet Singh

VS

Respondent

M.K.S. Infratech Pvt. Ltd.

Developer Firm

m.k.s. infratech pvt. ltd.

Disputed Amount

92,16,760

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestPromotional Misrepresentation

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

23 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126003192019 by Kunveer Jeet Singh against M.K.S. Infratech Pvt. Ltd. before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestPromotional Misrepresentation
2
Stage 130/05/2023

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order directing possession and instead ruled that the appellant is entitled to a full refund of the deposited amount plus interest at the rate of MCLR+1% from the date of deposit until actual refund due to project delays.

3
Stage 227/04/2023

Hearing

The appellant is challenging a Regulatory Authority order regarding a delay in possession, seeking a refund instead of the directed possession due to the respondent's failure to meet the timeline specified in the Allotment Letter.

4
Stage 320/03/2023

Hearing

No text available.

5
Stage 431/08/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal heard arguments regarding the appellant's claim for a refund with interest due to a three-year delay in possession by the respondent, and has reserved judgment on the matter.

6
Stage 502/08/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal noted the appellant's request to file a Vakalatnama and recorded that no settlement could be reached between the parties, subsequently adjourning the matter to 31.08.2022 for hearing.

7
Stage 626/05/2022

Hearing

The parties reported that settlement negotiations failed; consequently, the matter is scheduled for a hearing on its merits on 02.08.2022.

8
Stage 721/04/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal noted that the parties are likely to reach an out-of-court settlement and directed the appellant in person and the respondent's representative to appear on the next hearing date of 26.05.2022.

9
Stage 830/09/2021

Hearing

The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant and no request for adjournment.

10
Stage 909/09/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal directed the appellant's counsel to serve additional documents filed on 01.03.2021 to the respondent via email and permitted the respondent to file a reply within one week thereafter.

11
Stage 1027/04/2021

Hearing

No text available.

12
Stage 1102/04/2021

Hearing

No text available.

13
Stage 1208/03/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant three days to file documents regarding the respondent's communication on refunds and scheduled the next hearing for April 2, 2021.

14
Stage 1311/02/2021

For Order

No text available.

15
Stage 1428/01/2021

Final Hearing

The Tribunal directed the Registry to convert the matter into a Regular Appeal and granted a one-week extension for the deposition of costs previously imposed on 07.01.2021.

16
Stage 1507/01/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of an 8-day delay in filing the appeal, subject to a cost of Rs. 5,000/- to be used for library books, and scheduled the regular appeal for hearing on 28.01.2021.

17
Stage 1617/12/2020

Hearing

No text available.

18
Stage 17Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126003192019-30-05-2023

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order directing possession and instead ruled that the appellant is entitled to a full refund of the deposited amount plus interest at the rate of MCLR+1% from the date of deposit until actual refund due to project delays.

19
Stage 18Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126003192019-27-04-2023

The appellant is challenging a Regulatory Authority order regarding a delay in possession, seeking a refund instead of the directed possession due to the respondent's failure to meet the timeline specified in the Allotment Letter.

20
Stage 19Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126003192019-28-01-2021

The Tribunal directed the Registry to convert the matter into a Regular Appeal and granted a one-week extension for the deposition of costs previously imposed on 07.01.2021.

21
Stage 20Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126003192019-31-08-2022

The Tribunal heard arguments regarding the appellant's claim for a refund with interest due to a three-year delay in possession by the respondent, and has reserved judgment on the matter.

22
Stage 21Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126003192019-07-01-2021

The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of an 8-day delay in filing the appeal, subject to a cost of Rs. 5,000/- to be used for library books, and scheduled the regular appeal for hearing on 28.01.2021.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order directing possession and instead ruled that the appellant is entitled to a full refund of the deposited amount plus interest at the rate of MCLR+1% from the date of deposit until actual refund due to project delays. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1%.

Disposal Winner: AppellantInterest Rate: MCLR+1%Status: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order directing possession and instead ruled that the appellant is entitled to a full refund of the deposited amount plus interest at the rate of MCLR+1% from the date of deposit until actual refund due to project delays.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR+1%

Interest Period

from the date of deposit till the date of actual refund

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 12

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Kushagra Dikshit

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Vivek Kumar Shukla

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (5)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126003192019-30-05-2023

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order directing possession and instead ruled that the appellant is entitled to a full refund of the deposited amount plus interest at the rate of MCLR+1% from the date of deposit until actual refund due to project delays.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126003192019-27-04-2023

The appellant is challenging a Regulatory Authority order regarding a delay in possession, seeking a refund instead of the directed possession due to the respondent's failure to meet the timeline specified in the Allotment Letter.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126003192019-28-01-2021

The Tribunal directed the Registry to convert the matter into a Regular Appeal and granted a one-week extension for the deposition of costs previously imposed on 07.01.2021.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126003192019-31-08-2022

The Tribunal heard arguments regarding the appellant's claim for a refund with interest due to a three-year delay in possession by the respondent, and has reserved judgment on the matter.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126003192019-07-01-2021

The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of an 8-day delay in filing the appeal, subject to a cost of Rs. 5,000/- to be used for library books, and scheduled the regular appeal for hearing on 28.01.2021.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for m.k.s. infratech pvt. ltd.?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →