up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126003142022

Appellant / Complainant

U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad

VS

Respondent

Manju Lata Pal

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestStructural Defects & QualityJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

32 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126003142022 by U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad against Manju Lata Pal before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestStructural Defects & QualityJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 112/06/2024

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal allowed all 24 appeals and set aside the Adjudicating Officer's orders, ruling that the officer lacked jurisdiction to award interest for delayed possession under the guise of compensation and that claims for structural defects must first be brought to the promoter's notice.

3
Stage 229/05/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal heard arguments regarding the jurisdiction of an Adjudicating Officer's order and reserved its judgment for a later date.

4
Stage 316/05/2024

Hearing

No text available.

5
Stage 410/05/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal has ordered the appeal to be listed on 16.05.2024 along with other similar appeals for hearing or further orders.

6
Stage 525/04/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request to list the instant appeal along with Cross Appeal No. D 225/2022 on 10.05.2024 due to similar matters being scheduled for that date.

7
Stage 620/03/2024

Hearing

Upon the joint request of the counsels for both parties, the court has adjourned the hearing of Appeal-48/2022 and cross appeal No. D 225/2022 to 25.04.2024.

8
Stage 716/02/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 20.03.2024, to be heard alongside a related matter.

9
Stage 811/01/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal ordered that Appeal-48/2022 be listed for hearing on 16.02.2024 along with the respondent's cross-appeal (No. D 225/2022).

10
Stage 906/10/2023

Hearing

No text available.

11
Stage 1024/08/2023

Hearing

Upon the joint request of the counsels for both parties, the hearing for Appeal-48/2022 has been rescheduled to 06.10.2023.

12
Stage 1106/07/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to health grounds and rescheduled the hearing for August 24, 2023.

13
Stage 1227/04/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment from the counsels of both parties and rescheduled the case for hearing/orders on 06.07.2023.

14
Stage 1320/03/2023

Hearing

No text available.

15
Stage 1409/02/2023

Hearing

No text available.

16
Stage 1505/01/2023

Hearing

No text available.

17
Stage 1605/12/2022

Hearing

No text available.

18
Stage 1710/11/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant permission to file a replication/rejoinder against the respondent's reply and scheduled the next hearing for December 5, 2022.

19
Stage 1811/10/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for November 10, 2022.

20
Stage 1906/09/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and adjourned the matter to 11.10.2022 for further orders, to be heard alongside cross Appeal No. (D) 225/2022.

21
Stage 2023/08/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request to list Appeal-48/2022 alongside Appeal No. 225/2022 on 06.09.2022 for a joint hearing.

22
Stage 2104/08/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 23.08.2022 following a joint request from the counsels for both parties.

23
Stage 2221/07/2022

to file objections and its reply

The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to file a reply to the respondent's objection and adjourned the matter to 05.08.2022.

24
Stage 2330/05/2022

to file objections and its reply

No text available.

25
Stage 2412/05/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal directed the respondent to file objections in the correct folder within three days and granted the appellant one week to file a reply to those objections.

26
Stage 2507/04/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, citing the COVID-19 pandemic period as grounds for relaxation, and directed the defective appeal to be registered as a Regular Appeal.

27
Stage 2616/03/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the Appellant 10 days to file a reply to the Respondent's objections and scheduled the case for hearing on April 7, 2022, regarding the application for condonation of delay.

28
Stage 2724/02/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal adjourned the matter due to the respondent's counsel being on leave and directed the respondent to file objections within 10 days, with a subsequent reply from the applicant allowed within one week.

29
Stage 2825/01/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding the appeal and directed the appellant to serve the notice via speed post and file an affidavit of service before the next hearing on 24.02.2022.

30
Stage 29Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126003142022-12-06-2024

The Tribunal allowed all 24 appeals and set aside the Adjudicating Officer's orders, ruling that the officer lacked jurisdiction to award interest for delayed possession under the guise of compensation and that claims for structural defects must first be brought to the promoter's notice.

31
Stage 30Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126003142022-07-04-2022

The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, citing the COVID-19 pandemic period as grounds for relaxation, and directed the defective appeal to be registered as a Regular Appeal.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal allowed all 24 appeals and set aside the Adjudicating Officer's orders, ruling that the officer lacked jurisdiction to award interest for delayed possession under the guise of compensation and that claims for structural defects must first be brought to the promoter's notice. Awarded in favor of Appellant.

Disposal Winner: AppellantStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal allowed all 24 appeals and set aside the Adjudicating Officer's orders, ruling that the officer lacked jurisdiction to award interest for delayed possession under the guise of compensation and that claims for structural defects must first be brought to the promoter's notice.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 14(3)Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • N N Pandey

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Harish Pandey

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126003142022-12-06-2024

The Tribunal allowed all 24 appeals and set aside the Adjudicating Officer's orders, ruling that the officer lacked jurisdiction to award interest for delayed possession under the guise of compensation and that claims for structural defects must first be brought to the promoter's notice.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126003142022-07-04-2022

The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, citing the COVID-19 pandemic period as grounds for relaxation, and directed the defective appeal to be registered as a Regular Appeal.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for a builder?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →