Appellant / Complainant
Lal Devesh Bahadur Pal Singh
Respondent
Crest Realinfra Pvt. Ltd.
crest realinfra pvt. ltd.
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126003042019 by Lal Devesh Bahadur Pal Singh against Crest Realinfra Pvt. Ltd. before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of a 184-day delay and subsequently dismissed Misc. Case No. 673 of 2019 due to insufficient medical evidence supporting the reason for delay.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted the absence of the appellant's counsel and adjourned the matter to 15.10.2024 for hearing.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has adjourned the matter and scheduled the appeal for orders/hearing on 13.09.2024 due to the absence of the appellant's counsel.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directs that the case be listed before a different Bench of the Tribunal, following an order passed in Appeal No. 335/2021 on 12.01.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has listed a defective appeal for consideration of an application for condonation of delay and subsequent hearing on 03.11.2023.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the parties to submit specific documents, including the agreement between the appellant and respondent no. 2 and the plan sanction date, to ascertain the promised period of possession before the next hearing on 21-09-2023.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the case for orders/hearing on 24.05.2023.
Hearing
The case was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel and the absence of any request for adjournment.
Hearing
This is a procedural entry noting that the case was called on for hearing before the Division Bench.
For Order
The Tribunal heard arguments from the respondent's counsel and reserved the judgment for further consideration.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal heard arguments regarding the point of limitation and reserved its order for a later date.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 21.10.2021 and directed the parties to exchange pleadings and file originals with the Registry prior to the next hearing.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant 24 hours to file an application for condonation of delay and directed the exchange of documents between parties before listing the matter on 08.04.2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant two weeks to file a better affidavit for condonation of delay and scheduled the matter for hearing on 18.03.2021.
For Order
The Tribunal granted a request by the appellant's counsel to list the case on 23.02.2021.
Further Consideration
The Tribunal granted an adjournment request made by the appellant's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the case for hearing on 11.02.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126003042019-07-02-2023
The case was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel and the absence of any request for adjournment.
Tribunal Order #0901126003042019-15-10-2024
The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of a 184-day delay and subsequently dismissed Misc. Case No. 673 of 2019 due to insufficient medical evidence supporting the reason for delay.
Tribunal Order #0901126003042019-04-08-2023
The Tribunal directed the parties to submit specific documents, including the agreement between the appellant and respondent no. 2 and the plan sanction date, to ascertain the promised period of possession before the next hearing on 21-09-2023.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The case was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel and the absence of any request for adjournment. The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of a 184-day delay and subsequently dismissed Misc. Case No. 673 of 2019 due to insufficient medical evidence supporting the reason for delay. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The case was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel and the absence of any request for adjournment. The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of a 184-day delay and subsequently dismissed Misc. Case No. 673 of 2019 due to insufficient medical evidence supporting the reason for delay.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Abhinav Mishra
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Anurag Singh
- Vipul Agarwal
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The case was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel and the absence of any request for adjournment.
The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of a 184-day delay and subsequently dismissed Misc. Case No. 673 of 2019 due to insufficient medical evidence supporting the reason for delay.
The Tribunal directed the parties to submit specific documents, including the agreement between the appellant and respondent no. 2 and the plan sanction date, to ascertain the promised period of possession before the next hearing on 21-09-2023.
Need to research all rulings for crest realinfra pvt. ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.