Appellant / Complainant
Vaibhav Sharma
Respondent
Aims Rg Angel Promoters Private Limited
aims rg angel promoters private limited
Partial
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126002742022 by Vaibhav Sharma against Aims Rg Angel Promoters Private Limited before up_rera.
Hearing
The Tribunal dismissed 68 appeals as non-maintainable because the appellants were not original complainants before the Regulatory Authority, but extended the benefits of a previous judgment (Appeal No. 213/2019) to three specific maintainable appeals.
Delay condonation
This is a procedural order directing the parties to refer to the previous order passed in Appeal No. D 71/2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to a High Court engagement and directed the parties to exchange pleadings in the interim.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has scheduled the case for 11.08.2023 to consider an application for condonation of delay and for a hearing.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has listed this defective appeal for orders or hearing on 30.05.2023.
Delay condonation
This is a procedural order directing the parties to refer to a previous order passed in Appeal No. (D) 51/2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant a 10-day extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for hearing on September 27, 2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant ten days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for hearing on September 7, 2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has directed that the defective appeal be listed for hearing on 05.08.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and grounds of appeal, with subsequent timelines set for replies and e-portal uploads.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, with a subsequent deadline for the appellant to reply.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, with the matter scheduled for hearing on 09.05.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections and directed both parties to upload their pleadings to the e-portal, scheduling the matter for April 20, 2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal treated service upon the respondent as sufficient but ordered fresh notice to be issued and directed the applicant to serve the respondent with the appeal documents and application for condonation of delay.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week's time to file an affidavit of service and scheduled the defective appeal for a subsequent hearing on March 9, 2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding the appeal filed by Vaibhav Sharma and directed the appellant to serve the notice via speed post and file an affidavit of service before the next hearing on 25.02.2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126002742022-21-09-2023
The Tribunal dismissed 68 appeals as non-maintainable because the appellants were not original complainants before the Regulatory Authority, but extended the benefits of a previous judgment (Appeal No. 213/2019) to three specific maintainable appeals.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal dismissed 68 appeals as non-maintainable because the appellants were not original complainants before the Regulatory Authority, but extended the benefits of a previous judgment (Appeal No. 213/2019) to three specific maintainable appeals. Awarded in favor of Partial.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal dismissed 68 appeals as non-maintainable because the appellants were not original complainants before the Regulatory Authority, but extended the benefits of a previous judgment (Appeal No. 213/2019) to three specific maintainable appeals.
Ruling Awarded To
Partial
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Prashant Kumar
- Fuhar Gupta
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Azhar Ikram
- Manish Singh
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The Tribunal dismissed 68 appeals as non-maintainable because the appellants were not original complainants before the Regulatory Authority, but extended the benefits of a previous judgment (Appeal No. 213/2019) to three specific maintainable appeals.
Need to research all rulings for aims rg angel promoters private limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.