Appellant / Complainant
U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad
Respondent
Hemant Mathur
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126002712019 by U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad against Hemant Mathur before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 334-day delay, finding the explanation regarding lost documents to be fictitious and concocted, and consequently dismissed the appeal.
Further Order
The Tribunal heard arguments on the limitation application and has reserved its judgment on the issue of limitation.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the counsel's intent to resolve the dispute regarding parking and interest relief, subsequently adjourning the matter to 10.11.2021 for further orders.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the applicant to issue a fresh demand letter detailing all facts and figures to the respondent and noted the possibility of an out-of-court settlement.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file supporting documents via the Registry and email, while allowing the applicant the opportunity to file a rebuttal before the next hearing on 23.03.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126002712019-01-02-2022
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 334-day delay, finding the explanation regarding lost documents to be fictitious and concocted, and consequently dismissed the appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126002712019-23-03-2021
The Tribunal directed the applicant to issue a fresh demand letter detailing all facts and figures to the respondent and noted the possibility of an out-of-court settlement.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 334-day delay, finding the explanation regarding lost documents to be fictitious and concocted, and consequently dismissed the appeal. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 334-day delay, finding the explanation regarding lost documents to be fictitious and concocted, and consequently dismissed the appeal.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Akhand Pratap Singh
- Vijay Pratap Singh Chauhan
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Dileep Singh
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 334-day delay, finding the explanation regarding lost documents to be fictitious and concocted, and consequently dismissed the appeal.
The Tribunal directed the applicant to issue a fresh demand letter detailing all facts and figures to the respondent and noted the possibility of an out-of-court settlement.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.