Appellant / Complainant
Ravi Chandra, Neeta Chandra
Respondent
Geotech Promoters Private Limited
geotech promoters private limited
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126002632019 by Ravi Chandra, Neeta Chandra against Geotech Promoters Private Limited before up_rera.
Hearing
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the appellant attempted to seek new reliefs (withdrawal from project and refund) in the appeal that were not part of the original complaint before RERA, without challenging the existing RERA order.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 26.11.2021 and directed the parties to exchange pleadings and file originals in the Registry prior to the next hearing.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent one final opportunity to file a list of dates, events, and relied-upon cases before the next hearing on 02.11.2021.
Arguments
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final 15-day opportunity to file a list of dates and events and relied-upon judgments, warning that failure to comply will result in proceedings being initiated under the Act.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the hearing of the limitation application to 03.03.2021 at the request of the respondent's counsel and directed both parties to appear on the next date.
Tribunal Order #0901126002632019-26-11-2021
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the appellant attempted to seek new reliefs (withdrawal from project and refund) in the appeal that were not part of the original complaint before RERA, without challenging the existing RERA order.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the appellant attempted to seek new reliefs (withdrawal from project and refund) in the appeal that were not part of the original complaint before RERA, without challenging the existing RERA order. Awarded in favor of Respondent. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1% (as per RERA order) / 24% (as per appellant's prayer).
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the appellant attempted to seek new reliefs (withdrawal from project and refund) in the appeal that were not part of the original complaint before RERA, without challenging the existing RERA order.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR+1% (as per RERA order) / 24% (as per appellant's prayer)
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Rajinder Kumar
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Azhar Ikram
- S S Khullar
- Manish Singh
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the appellant attempted to seek new reliefs (withdrawal from project and refund) in the appeal that were not part of the original complaint before RERA, without challenging the existing RERA order.
Need to research all rulings for geotech promoters private limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.