Appellant / Complainant
Vipin Kumar Sharma
Respondent
Sare Saamag Realty Pvt. Ltd.
sare saamag realty pvt. ltd.
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126002622019 by Vipin Kumar Sharma against Sare Saamag Realty Pvt. Ltd. before up_rera.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the respondent's project was not registered with UPRERA, rendering the Act 2016 inapplicable and making the complaint non-maintainable under Supreme Court precedent.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to submit readable/typed copies of certain documents and adjourned the hearing to 16.08.2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to him being out of station and rescheduled the hearing for 22.07.2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a status report regarding bank liability and payments made to date, as well as concise written arguments, within 15 days.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal directed the parties to exchange lists of dates, events, and relied-upon case laws before the next hearing scheduled for 19.05.2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal ordered the case to proceed ex-parte against the respondent, M/S Sare Saamag Realty Pvt. Ltd., due to the withdrawal of their counsel and repeated non-appearance.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to illness and warned the respondent that the case will proceed ex parte if no representative appears at the next hearing on 20.01.2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal permitted the respondent's counsel to withdraw his Vakalatnama and issued a notice to the opposite party to engage new counsel, noting that the case will proceed if no one appears on the next fixed date.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the application to withdraw Vakalatnama by the respondent's counsel and directed the respondent to be informed via email to engage new counsel and file grounds of appeal before the next hearing on 21.12.2021.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 01.12.2021 due to the absence of the respondent and issued a warning that the matter will proceed ex-parte if no one appears on the next date.
Hearing
The Tribunal rejected the respondent's counsel's request to withdraw via email and issued a warning that failure to appear at the next hearing may result in proceedings under the Advocates Act, 1961.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the hearing for 22.10.2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the respondent's failure to comply with the order dated 17.03.2021 and adjourned the matter to 29.09.2021, directing the respondent to ensure compliance in the interim.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to produce evidence regarding the alleged cancellation of the appellant's units, details of partial payments returned, and records concerning loan settlements.
Hearing
The appeal is adjourned due to a lawyers' strike called by the Oudh Bar Association and is rescheduled for hearing on 17.03.2021.
For Order
The Tribunal directed the Registry to take fresh steps to summon the records regarding complaint no. 9201818500 and scheduled the matter for hearing on 25.02.2021.
Compliance of Interim Order
The Tribunal directed the Registry to summon the records of Complaint Case No. 9201818500 from the Regulatory Authority to address the controversy involved in the appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126002622019-19-05-2022
The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a status report regarding bank liability and payments made to date, as well as concise written arguments, within 15 days.
Tribunal Order #0901126002622019-16-08-2022
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the respondent's project was not registered with UPRERA, rendering the Act 2016 inapplicable and making the complaint non-maintainable under Supreme Court precedent.
Tribunal Order #0901126002622019-17-03-2021
The Tribunal directed the respondent to produce evidence regarding the alleged cancellation of the appellant's units, details of partial payments returned, and records concerning loan settlements.
Tribunal Order #0901126002622019-21-01-2021
The Tribunal directed the Registry to summon the records of Complaint Case No. 9201818500 from the Regulatory Authority to address the controversy involved in the appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126002622019-03-03-2022
The Tribunal ordered the case to proceed ex-parte against the respondent, M/S Sare Saamag Realty Pvt. Ltd., due to the withdrawal of their counsel and repeated non-appearance.
Tribunal Order #0901126002622019-22-10-2021
The Tribunal rejected the respondent's counsel's request to withdraw via email and issued a warning that failure to appear at the next hearing may result in proceedings under the Advocates Act, 1961.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the respondent's project was not registered with UPRERA, rendering the Act 2016 inapplicable and making the complaint non-maintainable under Supreme Court precedent. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the respondent's project was not registered with UPRERA, rendering the Act 2016 inapplicable and making the complaint non-maintainable under Supreme Court precedent.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Anshul Baranwal
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Shashi Kant Verma
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (6)
The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a status report regarding bank liability and payments made to date, as well as concise written arguments, within 15 days.
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the respondent's project was not registered with UPRERA, rendering the Act 2016 inapplicable and making the complaint non-maintainable under Supreme Court precedent.
The Tribunal directed the respondent to produce evidence regarding the alleged cancellation of the appellant's units, details of partial payments returned, and records concerning loan settlements.
The Tribunal directed the Registry to summon the records of Complaint Case No. 9201818500 from the Regulatory Authority to address the controversy involved in the appeal.
The Tribunal ordered the case to proceed ex-parte against the respondent, M/S Sare Saamag Realty Pvt. Ltd., due to the withdrawal of their counsel and repeated non-appearance.
The Tribunal rejected the respondent's counsel's request to withdraw via email and issued a warning that failure to appear at the next hearing may result in proceedings under the Advocates Act, 1961.
Need to research all rulings for sare saamag realty pvt. ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.