Appellant / Complainant
U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad
Respondent
Priyanka Yadav
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126002132019 by U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad against Priyanka Yadav before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay and consequently dismissed Misc. Case-438/2019, finding the explanation for the 353-day delay to be fictitious and concocted.
Further Order
The Tribunal heard arguments on the limitation application and reserved judgment on the point of limitation.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 10.11.2021 to align with the disposal schedule of similar cases, following arguments regarding parking allotment and interest grievances.
For Order
The applicant (developer) assured the Tribunal that all construction defects will be rectified and a parking space will be allotted to the respondent within 15 days.
For Order
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file supporting documents via the Registry and email, while allowing the appellant the opportunity to file a rebuttal before the next hearing on 23.03.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126002132019-10-02-2022
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay and consequently dismissed Misc. Case-438/2019, finding the explanation for the 353-day delay to be fictitious and concocted.
Tribunal Order #0901126002132019-23-03-2021
The applicant (developer) assured the Tribunal that all construction defects will be rectified and a parking space will be allotted to the respondent within 15 days.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay and consequently dismissed Misc. Case-438/2019, finding the explanation for the 353-day delay to be fictitious and concocted. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay and consequently dismissed Misc. Case-438/2019, finding the explanation for the 353-day delay to be fictitious and concocted.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Akhand Pratap Singh
- Vijay Pratap Singh Chauhan
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Dilip Singh
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay and consequently dismissed Misc. Case-438/2019, finding the explanation for the 353-day delay to be fictitious and concocted.
The applicant (developer) assured the Tribunal that all construction defects will be rectified and a parking space will be allotted to the respondent within 15 days.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.