Appellant / Complainant
U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad
Respondent
Ritesh Kumar Rawat
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126002122019 by U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad against Ritesh Kumar Rawat before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the 353-day delay was caused by fictitious and concocted reasons rather than sufficient cause.
Further Order
The Tribunal heard arguments regarding a limitation application and reserved its judgment on the issue of limitation.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad to execute the sale deed for the flat in favor of Ritesh Kumar Rawat without imposing unlawful conditions and to hand over possession within 15 days of execution, provided the respondent submits necessary documents and stamp papers within 10 days.
Delay condonation
The Appellant (U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad) expressed readiness to execute the sale deed and complete all facilities before handing over possession of the allotted flat to the Respondent.
For Order
The Tribunal adjourned the case due to the non-appearance of the Property Manager and imposed a cost of Rs. 2,000 on the applicant, with half to be paid to the respondent and half to the Tribunal fund.
Tribunal Order #0901126002122019-10-02-2022
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the 353-day delay was caused by fictitious and concocted reasons rather than sufficient cause.
Tribunal Order #0901126002122019-21-09-2021
The Tribunal directed the U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad to execute the sale deed for the flat in favor of Ritesh Kumar Rawat without imposing unlawful conditions and to hand over possession within 15 days of execution, provided the respondent submits necessary documents and stamp papers within 10 days.
Tribunal Order #0901126002122019-23-03-2021
The Appellant (U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad) expressed readiness to execute the sale deed and complete all facilities before handing over possession of the allotted flat to the Respondent.
Tribunal Order #0901126002122019-27-01-2021
The Tribunal adjourned the case due to the non-appearance of the Property Manager and imposed a cost of Rs. 2,000 on the applicant, with half to be paid to the respondent and half to the Tribunal fund.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the 353-day delay was caused by fictitious and concocted reasons rather than sufficient cause. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the 353-day delay was caused by fictitious and concocted reasons rather than sufficient cause.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Akhand Pratap Singh
- Vijay Pratap Singh Chauhan
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Abhishek Khare
- Aahuti Agarwal
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (4)
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the 353-day delay was caused by fictitious and concocted reasons rather than sufficient cause.
The Tribunal directed the U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad to execute the sale deed for the flat in favor of Ritesh Kumar Rawat without imposing unlawful conditions and to hand over possession within 15 days of execution, provided the respondent submits necessary documents and stamp papers within 10 days.
The Appellant (U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad) expressed readiness to execute the sale deed and complete all facilities before handing over possession of the allotted flat to the Respondent.
The Tribunal adjourned the case due to the non-appearance of the Property Manager and imposed a cost of Rs. 2,000 on the applicant, with half to be paid to the respondent and half to the Tribunal fund.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.