Appellant / Complainant
Lucknow Development Authority
Respondent
Anand Kumar Bhandari
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126002082019 by Lucknow Development Authority against Anand Kumar Bhandari before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the Lucknow Development Authority's application for condonation of delay, consequently dismissing the underlying appeal due to a lack of sufficient cause for the 338-day delay.
Further Order
The Tribunal heard arguments regarding a limitation application and its objection, subsequently reserving judgment on the issue of limitation.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act regarding payments to the respondent but directed the applicant to deposit a pending cost of Rs. 5,000 into the Tribunal's fund or face proceedings.
For Order
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 08.10.2021 for hearing to align with other cases involving the same builder-company and following a settlement in a related Lok Adalat proceeding.
Rest deposit Amount under 43(5) of the Act
No text available.
Hearing
The case is adjourned to 22.03.2021 because lawyers are abstaining from work due to a call by the Oudh Bar Association.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment but issued a directive to the applicant to ensure complete compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act or provide legal justification regarding that issue before the next hearing.
Tribunal Order #0901126002082019-03-03-2022
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the Lucknow Development Authority's application for condonation of delay, consequently dismissing the underlying appeal due to a lack of sufficient cause for the 338-day delay.
Tribunal Order #0901126002082019-27-10-2021
The Tribunal noted compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act regarding payments to the respondent but directed the applicant to deposit a pending cost of Rs. 5,000 into the Tribunal's fund or face proceedings.
Tribunal Order #0901126002082019-09-02-2021
The Tribunal granted an adjournment but issued a directive to the applicant to ensure complete compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act or provide legal justification regarding that issue before the next hearing.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the Lucknow Development Authority's application for condonation of delay, consequently dismissing the underlying appeal due to a lack of sufficient cause for the 338-day delay. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the Lucknow Development Authority's application for condonation of delay, consequently dismissing the underlying appeal due to a lack of sufficient cause for the 338-day delay.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Abhinav Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Hridesh Srivastava
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the Lucknow Development Authority's application for condonation of delay, consequently dismissing the underlying appeal due to a lack of sufficient cause for the 338-day delay.
The Tribunal noted compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act regarding payments to the respondent but directed the applicant to deposit a pending cost of Rs. 5,000 into the Tribunal's fund or face proceedings.
The Tribunal granted an adjournment but issued a directive to the applicant to ensure complete compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act or provide legal justification regarding that issue before the next hearing.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.