up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126001802019

Appellant / Complainant

U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad

VS

Respondent

Abha Jain, Nem Chand Jain

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

9 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126001802019 by U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad against Abha Jain, Nem Chand Jain before up_rera.

2
Stage 101/11/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal because the applicant failed to show 'sufficient cause' and did not apply for a certified copy within the statutory limitation period.

3
Stage 218/02/2021

For Order

The case was dismissed for want of prosecution because the appellant failed to appear in court and did not submit a request for adjournment.

4
Stage 302/02/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a revised affidavit for condonation of delay and directed parties to exchange objections via email before the next hearing on 18.02.2021.

5
Stage 415/01/2021

Hearing

No text available.

6
Stage 504/11/2020

Hearing

No text available.

7
Stage 609/10/2020

Further Order

No text available.

8
Stage 7Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126001802019-01-11-2021

The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal because the applicant failed to show 'sufficient cause' and did not apply for a certified copy within the statutory limitation period.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal because the applicant failed to show 'sufficient cause' and did not apply for a certified copy within the statutory limitation period. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal because the applicant failed to show 'sufficient cause' and did not apply for a certified copy within the statutory limitation period.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Vijay Pratap Singh Chauhan

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Abhishek Shukla

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126001802019-01-11-2021

The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal because the applicant failed to show 'sufficient cause' and did not apply for a certified copy within the statutory limitation period.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for a builder?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →