Appellant / Complainant
Manish Kumar
Respondent
Mahagun India Pvt. Ltd.
mahagun india pvt. ltd.
Both (Amicably Settled)
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126001752019 by Manish Kumar against Mahagun India Pvt. Ltd. before up_rera.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal noted that the appellant's counsel lacked instructions to proceed, but the respondent informed the court that the dispute between the parties has been amicably settled.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 17-07-2023 for consideration of a delay condonation application after the appellant's counsel reported that the dispute between the parties has been resolved.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the matter due to lack of time and rescheduled the hearing for July 5, 2023.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal noted the respondent's failure to provide annexures to the appellant and warned that inferences would be drawn against the respondent during the hearing if these documents are not furnished.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal examined whether the Regulatory Authority's order was within the scope of the original pleadings and directed the respondent to file a Vakalatnama and reply to the grounds of appeal before the next hearing on 01.12.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the appellant's objection regarding incomplete annexures from the respondent and adjourned the matter to 01.12.2022 for hearing.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal in the interest of justice and scheduled the matter for a hearing on 09.11.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to provide all annexures to their reply and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 10.10.2022.
Exchange of pleadings
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent and scheduled the next hearing for 21.09.2022, directing counsel for both parties to appear without fail.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to provide a complete copy of their reply to the appellant and ordered the appellant to file a replication/rejoinder upon receipt before the next hearing on 23.08.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to provide a complete copy of their reply to the appellant and ordered the appellant to file a replication before the next hearing on 19.07.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the appellant's counsel to file a replication/rejoinder by the next hearing date and provided a new listing date of 09.05.2022 for final hearing.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application for condonation of delay, permitting the appeal to be registered as a Regular Appeal subject to a cost of Rs. 4,000/-.
Hearing
The Tribunal heard arguments regarding the point of limitation and subsequently reserved orders on that specific issue.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 08.12.2021 for the disposal of a limitation application and any related objections.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed that the matter be listed before Bench No. 2 on 26.11.2021 for the delivery of a reserved order regarding an application for condonation of delay.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the pronouncement of the order on the application for condonation of delay to 22.11.2021 due to the unavailability of the concerned Bench.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel permission to file additional submissions regarding the point of limitation within 15 days and rescheduled the case for an order on 01.11.2021.
For Order
The matter is noted as part-heard from Bench No. 2 and is scheduled to be listed before the concerned Bench on March 18, 2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126001752019-17-07-2023
The Tribunal noted that the appellant's counsel lacked instructions to proceed, but the respondent informed the court that the dispute between the parties has been amicably settled.
Tribunal Order #0901126001752019-19-11-2022
The Tribunal examined whether the Regulatory Authority's order was within the scope of the original pleadings and directed the respondent to file a Vakalatnama and reply to the grounds of appeal before the next hearing on 01.12.2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126001752019-24-12-2021
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application for condonation of delay, permitting the appeal to be registered as a Regular Appeal subject to a cost of Rs. 4,000/-.
Tribunal Order #0901126001752019-01-12-2022
The Tribunal noted the respondent's failure to provide annexures to the appellant and warned that inferences would be drawn against the respondent during the hearing if these documents are not furnished.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal noted that the appellant's counsel lacked instructions to proceed, but the respondent informed the court that the dispute between the parties has been amicably settled. The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application for condonation of delay, permitting the appeal to be registered as a Regular Appeal subject to a cost of Rs. 4,000/-. Awarded in favor of Both (Amicably Settled).
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal noted that the appellant's counsel lacked instructions to proceed, but the respondent informed the court that the dispute between the parties has been amicably settled. The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application for condonation of delay, permitting the appeal to be registered as a Regular Appeal subject to a cost of Rs. 4,000/-.
Ruling Awarded To
Both (Amicably Settled)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Fuhar Gupta
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Anurag Srivastava
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (4)
The Tribunal noted that the appellant's counsel lacked instructions to proceed, but the respondent informed the court that the dispute between the parties has been amicably settled.
The Tribunal examined whether the Regulatory Authority's order was within the scope of the original pleadings and directed the respondent to file a Vakalatnama and reply to the grounds of appeal before the next hearing on 01.12.2022.
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application for condonation of delay, permitting the appeal to be registered as a Regular Appeal subject to a cost of Rs. 4,000/-.
The Tribunal noted the respondent's failure to provide annexures to the appellant and warned that inferences would be drawn against the respondent during the hearing if these documents are not furnished.
Need to research all rulings for mahagun india pvt. ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.