Appellant / Complainant
Lalit Mohan Srivastava, Amita Srivastava
Respondent
Lucknow Development Authority
₹5,70,583
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126001732020 by Lalit Mohan Srivastava, Amita Srivastava against Lucknow Development Authority before up_rera.
Judgement
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order that had rejected the appellants' complaint, ruling that a home buyer does not lose the right to claim compensation for delayed possession even after executing a sale deed and taking possession. The matter is remanded to the Regulatory Authority for a fresh examination of the complaint regarding both delayed possession and deficiency in advertised amenities.
Tribunal Order #0901126001732020-24-08-2021
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order that had rejected the appellants' complaint, ruling that a home buyer does not lose the right to claim compensation for delayed possession even after executing a sale deed and taking possession. The matter is remanded to the Regulatory Authority for a fresh examination of the complaint regarding both delayed possession and deficiency in advertised amenities.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order that had rejected the appellants' complaint, ruling that a home buyer does not lose the right to claim compensation for delayed possession even after executing a sale deed and taking possession. The matter is remanded to the Regulatory Authority for a fresh examination of the complaint regarding both delayed possession and deficiency in advertised amenities. Awarded in favor of Appellant.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order that had rejected the appellants' complaint, ruling that a home buyer does not lose the right to claim compensation for delayed possession even after executing a sale deed and taking possession. The matter is remanded to the Regulatory Authority for a fresh examination of the complaint regarding both delayed possession and deficiency in advertised amenities.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Hridesh Srivastava
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Harish Pandey
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order that had rejected the appellants' complaint, ruling that a home buyer does not lose the right to claim compensation for delayed possession even after executing a sale deed and taking possession. The matter is remanded to the Regulatory Authority for a fresh examination of the complaint regarding both delayed possession and deficiency in advertised amenities.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.