up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126001702019

Appellant / Complainant

Ghaziabad Development Authority

VS

Respondent

Anoop Kumar Verma

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / Interest

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

22 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126001702019 by Ghaziabad Development Authority against Anoop Kumar Verma before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / Interest
2
Stage 123/11/2022

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the Ghaziabad Development Authority's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ordering that the pre-deposited amount under Section 43(5) be transferred to the Regulatory Authority for disbursement to the respondent.

3
Stage 202/05/2022

Final Hearing

The Tribunal heard arguments regarding a delay condonation application and its objection, subsequently reserving judgment on the issue of delay.

4
Stage 324/03/2022

Final Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for May 2, 2022.

5
Stage 407/03/2022

Final Hearing

The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a physical copy of the CA certificate and upload it to the e-Portal due to visibility issues, and adjourned the matter to 24.03.2022 for potential withdrawal.

6
Stage 507/01/2022

Hearing on Appeal

The Tribunal granted the appellant a 10-day extension to file a C.A. Certificate required for calculating compliance amounts under Section 43(5) of the Act.

7
Stage 629/11/2021

Hearing

The appeal filed by Ghaziabad Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their counsel.

8
Stage 702/11/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the applicant an extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections, subject to a cost of Rs. 10,000/- to be used for library books, with liberty to recover said cost from the responsible official.

9
Stage 817/09/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal directed the applicant to appear through an authorized representative for settlement decisions and ordered the respondent to appear in person, while scheduling a hearing on 02.11.2021 for the deposit of the remaining amount required under Section 43(5) of the Act, 2016.

10
Stage 919/04/2021

Delay condonation

No text available.

11
Stage 1023/03/2021

Delay condonation

No text available.

12
Stage 1104/03/2021

Hearing

The case is adjourned to 23.03.2021 due to a lawyers' strike, with a direction for parties to exchange pleadings in the interim.

13
Stage 1215/02/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal corrected a clerical error regarding counsel representation and granted the applicant one week to file a reply to the respondent's objections, directing all parties to upload documents to the e-portal.

14
Stage 1302/02/2021

For Order

The Tribunal directed the applicant to file a replication/rejoinder against the respondent's objections and mandated the submission of a C.A. certificate regarding the calculation of deposits made under Section 43(5) of the Act.

15
Stage 1415/01/2021

Compliance of section 43(5)

No text available.

16
Stage 1503/11/2020

Compliance of section 43(5)

No text available.

17
Stage 16Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126001702019-23-11-2022

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the Ghaziabad Development Authority's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ordering that the pre-deposited amount under Section 43(5) be transferred to the Regulatory Authority for disbursement to the respondent.

18
Stage 17Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126001702019-29-11-2021

The appeal filed by Ghaziabad Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their counsel.

19
Stage 18Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126001702019-02-11-2021

The Tribunal granted the applicant an extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections, subject to a cost of Rs. 10,000/- to be used for library books, with liberty to recover said cost from the responsible official.

20
Stage 19Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126001702019-17-09-2021

The Tribunal directed the applicant to appear through an authorized representative for settlement decisions and ordered the respondent to appear in person, while scheduling a hearing on 02.11.2021 for the deposit of the remaining amount required under Section 43(5) of the Act, 2016.

21
Stage 20Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126001702019-02-02-2021

The Tribunal directed the applicant to file a replication/rejoinder against the respondent's objections and mandated the submission of a C.A. certificate regarding the calculation of deposits made under Section 43(5) of the Act.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the Ghaziabad Development Authority's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ordering that the pre-deposited amount under Section 43(5) be transferred to the Regulatory Authority for disbursement to the respondent. The appeal filed by Ghaziabad Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their counsel. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the Ghaziabad Development Authority's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ordering that the pre-deposited amount under Section 43(5) be transferred to the Regulatory Authority for disbursement to the respondent. The appeal filed by Ghaziabad Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their counsel.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Manoj Kumar

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Vijay Singh Gaur

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (5)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126001702019-23-11-2022

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the Ghaziabad Development Authority's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ordering that the pre-deposited amount under Section 43(5) be transferred to the Regulatory Authority for disbursement to the respondent.

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126001702019-29-11-2021

The appeal filed by Ghaziabad Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their counsel.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126001702019-02-11-2021

The Tribunal granted the applicant an extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections, subject to a cost of Rs. 10,000/- to be used for library books, with liberty to recover said cost from the responsible official.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126001702019-17-09-2021

The Tribunal directed the applicant to appear through an authorized representative for settlement decisions and ordered the respondent to appear in person, while scheduling a hearing on 02.11.2021 for the deposit of the remaining amount required under Section 43(5) of the Act, 2016.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126001702019-02-02-2021

The Tribunal directed the applicant to file a replication/rejoinder against the respondent's objections and mandated the submission of a C.A. certificate regarding the calculation of deposits made under Section 43(5) of the Act.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for a builder?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →