Appellant / Complainant
Bhup Singh Yadav
Respondent
Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority
Partial
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126001622019 by Bhup Singh Yadav against Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority before up_rera.
Hearing
The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, modifying the previous order to mandate that the respondent pay delay interest at a uniform rate of MCLR+1% p.a. from the date of delay (21.11.2013) until the offer of possession or obtaining OC/CC, whichever is later.
Hearing
The Tribunal heard arguments from both counsels and scheduled the appeal for final arguments on July 8, 2025.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the case for orders on July 2, 2025, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted for the appellant.
For Order
The Tribunal denied an adjournment application filed by the respondent's counsel due to illness and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 02.05.2025.
For Order
The Tribunal noted the absence of the respondent's counsel and adjourned the matter to 08.04.2025 for orders.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to him being out of station and scheduled the case for orders on 12.03.2025.
For Order
The Tribunal granted a request to adjourn the matter and scheduled the appeal for orders on February 6, 2025, due to the absence of the respondent's counsel.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to illness and scheduled the matter for orders on 23.01.2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal heard arguments regarding the rate of delay interest awarded by the Regulatory Authority and has reserved its judgment.
Hearing
The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 25.09.2024 following a joint request from both parties.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings in Appeal-409/2022 and scheduled the matter for hearing on 23.08.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 22.07.2024 because the counsel for the appellant was unavailable due to a conflicting online hearing.
Hearing
The Tribunal has rescheduled the hearing for this defective appeal to 22.05.2024 due to the absence of the respondent's counsel.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to his absence and rescheduled the hearing for 22.04.2024.
Hearing
The court granted a request from the appellant's counsel to adjourn today's proceedings and rescheduled the appeal for orders/hearing on 15.03.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal refers the parties to a previous order passed in Appeal No. 407/2022 regarding the current matter.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings because counsel for the respondent was reported to be ill and scheduled the matter for hearing on 01.11.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to comply with a previous order dated 14.07.2023 and to file a reply to the respondent's objections, scheduling the next hearing for 20.09.2023.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal directed the appellant's counsel to place the online complaint filed before the Regulatory Authority on record within one week and scheduled the matter for hearing on 03.08.2023.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 14.07.2023.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal has revised the list and rescheduled the hearing for Appeal-409/2022 to July 5, 2023, due to lack of time.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted a joint request from the counsels of both parties to adjourn the hearing and rescheduled the appeal for 05.12.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for final hearing on 05.12.2022.
Further Order
The parties expressed their respective positions regarding interest rates for delayed possession, with the appellant proposing MCLR+1% and the respondent offering 6% interest from the inception of the RERA Act, leading to a scheduled hearing on 10.11.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for 11.10.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and directed the parties to file a list of dates and events at least 10 days before the next hearing scheduled for September 8, 2022.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal allowed the applications for condonation of delay in Misc. Cases No. 606/2019, 607/2019, 608/2019, and 609/2019, directing them to be registered as regular appeals subject to a cost of Rs. 3,000 per case.
Hearing
The Tribunal heard arguments regarding a limitation application and reserved judgment, allowing the applicant ten days to file supporting case laws.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the absence of parties during the hearing and ordered that notices be issued to all parties and their counsels via e-mail, scheduling the next hearing for 28.10.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126001622019-11-10-2022
The parties expressed their respective positions regarding interest rates for delayed possession, with the appellant proposing MCLR+1% and the respondent offering 6% interest from the inception of the RERA Act, leading to a scheduled hearing on 10.11.2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126001622019-08-07-2025
The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, modifying the previous order to mandate that the respondent pay delay interest at a uniform rate of MCLR+1% p.a. from the date of delay (21.11.2013) until the offer of possession or obtaining OC/CC, whichever is later.
Tribunal Order #0901126001622019-13-06-2022
The Tribunal allowed the applications for condonation of delay in Misc. Cases No. 606/2019, 607/2019, 608/2019, and 609/2019, directing them to be registered as regular appeals subject to a cost of Rs. 3,000 per case.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, modifying the previous order to mandate that the respondent pay delay interest at a uniform rate of MCLR+1% p.a. from the date of delay (21.11.2013) until the offer of possession or obtaining OC/CC, whichever is later. Awarded in favor of Partial. Awarded interest rate: MCLR + 1% p.a..
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, modifying the previous order to mandate that the respondent pay delay interest at a uniform rate of MCLR+1% p.a. from the date of delay (21.11.2013) until the offer of possession or obtaining OC/CC, whichever is later.
Ruling Awarded To
Partial
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR + 1% p.a.
Interest Period
from 21.11.2013 till offer of possession/obtaining of OC/CC whichever is later
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Amit Yadav
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Ankit Raj Chaudhary
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The parties expressed their respective positions regarding interest rates for delayed possession, with the appellant proposing MCLR+1% and the respondent offering 6% interest from the inception of the RERA Act, leading to a scheduled hearing on 10.11.2022.
The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, modifying the previous order to mandate that the respondent pay delay interest at a uniform rate of MCLR+1% p.a. from the date of delay (21.11.2013) until the offer of possession or obtaining OC/CC, whichever is later.
The Tribunal allowed the applications for condonation of delay in Misc. Cases No. 606/2019, 607/2019, 608/2019, and 609/2019, directing them to be registered as regular appeals subject to a cost of Rs. 3,000 per case.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.