up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126001562019

Appellant / Complainant

Samar Vijay Singh

VS

Respondent

Lucknow Development Authority

Disputed Amount

44,50,000

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestSale Deed & Title TransferPromotional MisrepresentationMaintenance & Utility Disputes

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

6 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126001562019 by Samar Vijay Singh against Lucknow Development Authority before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestSale Deed & Title TransferPromotional MisrepresentationMaintenance & Utility Disputes
2
Stage 109/06/2021

Judgement Reserve

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the Regulatory Authority's order regarding interest for delayed possession and GST payments, while specifically setting aside a direction that parking charges be included in the flat cost, ruling instead that they are separately payable per the agreement.

3
Stage 207/01/2021

Final Hearing

No text available.

4
Stage 304/12/2020

Final Hearing

No text available.

5
Stage 4Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126001562019-09-06-2021

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the Regulatory Authority's order regarding interest for delayed possession and GST payments, while specifically setting aside a direction that parking charges be included in the flat cost, ruling instead that they are separately payable per the agreement.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the Regulatory Authority's order regarding interest for delayed possession and GST payments, while specifically setting aside a direction that parking charges be included in the flat cost, ruling instead that they are separately payable per the agreement. Awarded in favor of Respondent. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1%.

Disposal Winner: RespondentInterest Rate: MCLR+1%Status: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the Regulatory Authority's order regarding interest for delayed possession and GST payments, while specifically setting aside a direction that parking charges be included in the flat cost, ruling instead that they are separately payable per the agreement.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR+1%

Interest Period

25.09.2016 to 25.08.2018

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 11(4)(f)Section 17Section 12Section 11(4)(d)Section 19(6)

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Samar Vijay Singh

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Harish Pandey

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126001562019-09-06-2021

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the Regulatory Authority's order regarding interest for delayed possession and GST payments, while specifically setting aside a direction that parking charges be included in the flat cost, ruling instead that they are separately payable per the agreement.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for a builder?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →