Appellant / Complainant
Pranjal Rastogi
Respondent
Hi Tech Township Ltd
hi tech township ltd
₹12,30,687
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126001382019 by Pranjal Rastogi against Hi Tech Township Ltd before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal set aside the U.P. RERA orders that erroneously dismissed the complaint based on a non-existent settlement and directed the respondent to refund Rs. 12,30,686.79 to the appellant with interest at MCLR+1% per annum.
Hearing
The Tribunal heard arguments from the appellant's counsel while the respondent's counsel declined to make submissions due to lack of instructions; judgment has been reserved.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to a scheduling conflict at the High Court and rescheduled the matter for 15.05.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the hearing for May 8, 2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to clarify a refund proposal dated 17.02.2020 regarding interest rates and repayment timelines following the demission of the previous presiding member.
Further Order
The Tribunal heard arguments from both parties regarding Appeal-759/2021 and reserved the judgment for a later date.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the presence of counsel for both parties and, following a submission regarding a prior settlement agreement, adjourned the matter to 17.01.2022 for further orders.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a one-week extension to the respondent's counsel to seek instructions due to personal illness and rescheduled the hearing for 30.12.2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to report on the status of their previously submitted refund proposal dated 17.02.2020 within three days.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the case due to non-appearance of parties and directed that notices be issued via e-mail for the next hearing scheduled on 29.10.2021.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal adjourned the defective appeal due to a lawyer strike by the Oudh Bar Association and directed the parties to exchange their pleadings in the interim.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file their vakalatnama and reply to the grounds of appeal within specified timelines and scheduled the next hearing for March 1, 2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126001382019-22-11-2021
The Tribunal directed the respondent to report on the status of their previously submitted refund proposal dated 17.02.2020 within three days.
Tribunal Order #0901126001382019-31-05-2023
The Tribunal set aside the U.P. RERA orders that erroneously dismissed the complaint based on a non-existent settlement and directed the respondent to refund Rs. 12,30,686.79 to the appellant with interest at MCLR+1% per annum.
Tribunal Order #0901126001382019-15-03-2023
The Tribunal directed the respondent to clarify a refund proposal dated 17.02.2020 regarding interest rates and repayment timelines following the demission of the previous presiding member.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal set aside the U.P. RERA orders that erroneously dismissed the complaint based on a non-existent settlement and directed the respondent to refund Rs. 12,30,686.79 to the appellant with interest at MCLR+1% per annum. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1% per annum.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal set aside the U.P. RERA orders that erroneously dismissed the complaint based on a non-existent settlement and directed the respondent to refund Rs. 12,30,686.79 to the appellant with interest at MCLR+1% per annum.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR+1% per annum
Interest Period
from the date of deposit till the refund of the amount
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Atharva Arya
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Anurag Singh
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The Tribunal directed the respondent to report on the status of their previously submitted refund proposal dated 17.02.2020 within three days.
The Tribunal set aside the U.P. RERA orders that erroneously dismissed the complaint based on a non-existent settlement and directed the respondent to refund Rs. 12,30,686.79 to the appellant with interest at MCLR+1% per annum.
The Tribunal directed the respondent to clarify a refund proposal dated 17.02.2020 regarding interest rates and repayment timelines following the demission of the previous presiding member.
Need to research all rulings for hi tech township ltd?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.