Appellant / Complainant
Manoj Kumar
Respondent
Mahaluxmi Realtech Pvt. Ltd.
mahaluxmi realtech pvt. ltd.
₹1,52,000
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126001312019 by Manoj Kumar against Mahaluxmi Realtech Pvt. Ltd. before up_rera.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Regulatory Authority, ruling that the respondent/builder was justified in forfeiting the earnest money due to the appellant's default in installment payments.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and scheduled the appeal for a final hearing on December 1, 2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for November 9, 2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the absence of the respondent's counsel and adjourned the matter to 09.09.2022 for final hearing.
Hearing
This text represents the header/caption of an appeal (APPEAL-998/2021) before the U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal involving Manoj Kumar versus Mahaluxmi Realtech Pvt. Ltd., but contains no substantive ruling or directive.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file written submissions before the next hearing and scheduled the appeal for further hearing on 01.07.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a list of dates, events, and relied-upon judgments, and scheduled the next hearing for April 27, 2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal disposed of the limitation application, ruling that the appeal was filed within time due to a correction in the impugned order's flat cost; consequently, the Registry is directed to register the case as a regular appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the parties and scheduled the case for 16.12.2021 to dispose of the limitation application and objections.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to serve a copy of their objection via email to the applicant and set a timeline for the filing of replies and document uploads before the next hearing on 23.11.2021.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment request due to the counsel's illness and directed the parties to exchange pleadings and file originals in the Registry before the next hearing on 02.11.2021.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 01.10.2021 as no parties were present during the hearing.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted a request for a passover by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the matter to 08.04.2021.
For Order
The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a reply to the respondent's objections regarding the application for condonation of delay within ten days and scheduled the matter for hearing on 12.03.2021.
Notice
The Tribunal granted the respondent two weeks to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, with a subsequent week allowed for the applicant's reply.
Tribunal Order #0901126001312019-19-11-2022
The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Regulatory Authority, ruling that the respondent/builder was justified in forfeiting the earnest money due to the appellant's default in installment payments.
Tribunal Order #0901126001312019-16-12-2021
The Tribunal disposed of the limitation application, ruling that the appeal was filed within time due to a correction in the impugned order's flat cost; consequently, the Registry is directed to register the case as a regular appeal.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Regulatory Authority, ruling that the respondent/builder was justified in forfeiting the earnest money due to the appellant's default in installment payments. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Regulatory Authority, ruling that the respondent/builder was justified in forfeiting the earnest money due to the appellant's default in installment payments.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Umesh Kumar Shivastava
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Priyam Sinha
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Regulatory Authority, ruling that the respondent/builder was justified in forfeiting the earnest money due to the appellant's default in installment payments.
The Tribunal disposed of the limitation application, ruling that the appeal was filed within time due to a correction in the impugned order's flat cost; consequently, the Registry is directed to register the case as a regular appeal.
Need to research all rulings for mahaluxmi realtech pvt. ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.