up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126001282019

Appellant / Complainant

Arihant Infra Realtors Pvt. Ltd.

VS

Respondent

Yogesh Srivastava

Developer Firm

arihant infra realtors pvt. ltd.

Disputed Amount

52,81,836

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestPromotional MisrepresentationJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

14 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126001282019 by Arihant Infra Realtors Pvt. Ltd. against Yogesh Srivastava before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestPromotional MisrepresentationJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 123/03/2022

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the promoter's appeal and upheld the RERA order directing a refund of Rs. 52,81,836 to the respondent with interest at MCLR+1%, finding that the developer failed to provide the promised park-facing view despite collecting PLC charges.

3
Stage 227/09/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal heard arguments from the counsels representing both the appellant and the respondent and subsequently reserved the judgment.

4
Stage 313/04/2021

Hearing

No text available.

5
Stage 426/03/2021

Hearing

No text available.

6
Stage 505/03/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 26.03.2021 because lawyers were abstaining from judicial work in support of a call by the Oudh Bar Association, and extended any existing interim orders until the next hearing.

7
Stage 618/02/2021

For Order

The Tribunal notes the appellant's additional deposit of Rs. 53,73,168/-, bringing the total to Rs. 76,83,168/- for compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act, and directs the Registry to verify this compliance before the next hearing on 05.03.2021.

8
Stage 704/02/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant a final 10-day extension to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act 2016, warning that failure to do so by the next hearing will result in the dismissal of the appeal.

9
Stage 811/01/2021

Further Order

No text available.

10
Stage 907/12/2020

Further Order

No text available.

11
Stage 10Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126001282019-18-02-2021

The Tribunal notes the appellant's additional deposit of Rs. 53,73,168/-, bringing the total to Rs. 76,83,168/- for compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act, and directs the Registry to verify this compliance before the next hearing on 05.03.2021.

12
Stage 11Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126001282019-04-02-2021

The Tribunal granted the appellant a final 10-day extension to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act 2016, warning that failure to do so by the next hearing will result in the dismissal of the appeal.

13
Stage 12Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126001282019-23-03-2022

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the promoter's appeal and upheld the RERA order directing a refund of Rs. 52,81,836 to the respondent with interest at MCLR+1%, finding that the developer failed to provide the promised park-facing view despite collecting PLC charges.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the promoter's appeal and upheld the RERA order directing a refund of Rs. 52,81,836 to the respondent with interest at MCLR+1%, finding that the developer failed to provide the promised park-facing view despite collecting PLC charges. Awarded in favor of Respondent. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1% percent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentInterest Rate: MCLR+1% percentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the promoter's appeal and upheld the RERA order directing a refund of Rs. 52,81,836 to the respondent with interest at MCLR+1%, finding that the developer failed to provide the promised park-facing view despite collecting PLC charges.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR+1% percent

Interest Period

from the date of deposit till the date refund

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 12Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Azhar Ikram
  • Manish Singh

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Harish Pandey

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126001282019-18-02-2021

The Tribunal notes the appellant's additional deposit of Rs. 53,73,168/-, bringing the total to Rs. 76,83,168/- for compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act, and directs the Registry to verify this compliance before the next hearing on 05.03.2021.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126001282019-04-02-2021

The Tribunal granted the appellant a final 10-day extension to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act 2016, warning that failure to do so by the next hearing will result in the dismissal of the appeal.

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126001282019-23-03-2022

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the promoter's appeal and upheld the RERA order directing a refund of Rs. 52,81,836 to the respondent with interest at MCLR+1%, finding that the developer failed to provide the promised park-facing view despite collecting PLC charges.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for arihant infra realtors pvt. ltd.?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →