Appellant / Complainant
Sapna Singh, Anr
Respondent
Panchsheel Buildtech Pvt. Ltd.
panchsheel buildtech pvt. ltd.
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126001242019 by Sapna Singh, Anr against Panchsheel Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. before up_rera.
Hearing
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their counsel.
Hearing
The court adjourned the matter due to the absence of the appellant's counsel and the respondent's counsel being out of station, rescheduling the hearing for 21.02.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel on health grounds and rescheduled the hearing for 11.10.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment due to the appellant's counsel's unavailability and scheduled the hearing for 25.08.2023, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted.
Hearing
The Tribunal has noted that the appeal is ripe for hearing and, upon a joint request from both parties' counsels, has scheduled the matter for hearing on 16.08.2023.
Final Hearing
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal has granted an adjournment and scheduled the matter for its next hearing on 23.11.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the hearing for 24.11.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal due to the non-appearance of parties and scheduled the matter for hearing on 15.09.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed counsels to correct the pagination of the proceedings and rescheduled the appeal hearing to 18.08.2022 upon joint request.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the hearing for August 10, 2022.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to personal illness and allowed 10 days for the respondent to file a reply to objections.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment request from the appellant's counsel due to a scheduling conflict and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 05.07.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment due to the appellant's counsel's illness and extended the deadline for the respondent to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final one-week opportunity to file an objection to the application for condonation of delay, failing which the right to object will be forfeited.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the case due to counsel unavailability and directed the respondent to serve objections regarding the delay condonation application and grounds of appeal via email within 10 days.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and grounds of appeal, with a subsequent deadline for the applicant's reply.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request by the appellant's counsel to list the case on 06.12.2021 for consideration of an application for condonation of delay and hearing.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the case to 15.11.2021 because the counsel for the applicant was hospitalized due to sudden illness.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file their vakalatnama, objections to the limitation application, and grounds of appeal within 15 days, with the matter listed for March 26, 2021.
Further Order
The Tribunal directed the respondent's counsel to file a vakalatnama along with the required documents within three days and adjourned the matter to 12.02.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126001242019-23-11-2022
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Kaviya Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Amit Yadav
- Raj Singh
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel.
Need to research all rulings for panchsheel buildtech pvt. ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.