up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126001142019

Appellant / Complainant

Maninder Singh

VS

Respondent

Gardenia Aims Developers Pvt. Ltd.

Developer Firm

gardenia aims developers pvt. ltd.

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

23 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126001142019 by Maninder Singh against Gardenia Aims Developers Pvt. Ltd. before up_rera.

2
Stage 119/09/2023

Hearing

The appellant requested to withdraw the appeal, and the Tribunal permitted the withdrawal, subsequently dismissing the appeal as not pressed.

3
Stage 210/08/2023

Final Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request from the appellant's counsel to reschedule the hearing of Appeal-85/2019 to 19.09.2023.

4
Stage 314/07/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to urgent work at the High Court and rescheduled the matter for hearing on 10.08.2023.

5
Stage 423/05/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to scheduling conflicts and upcoming summer vacations, rescheduling the matter for hearing on 14.07.2023.

6
Stage 525/04/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to her unavailability and rescheduled the matter for hearing on 23.05.2023, with a strict directive that no further adjournments will be permitted.

7
Stage 616/03/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the hearing for 25.04.2023.

8
Stage 718/04/2022

Part Heard

The Tribunal reserved judgment after hearing arguments regarding the appellant's attempt to seek a refund instead of possession and noted procedural issues concerning an unserved amendment application.

9
Stage 824/02/2022

Part Heard

The Tribunal noted the appellant's submission of written arguments and granted the respondent permission to file their own written arguments before the next hearing. The case is adjourned to 18.04.2022.

10
Stage 913/01/2022

Part Heard

No text available.

11
Stage 1014/12/2021

Further Order

The Tribunal noted the absence of the appellant and adjourned the matter to 13.01.2022 following arguments regarding the validity of an amendment application filed by the appellant.

12
Stage 1120/11/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal directed both parties to file proof regarding the receipt of an amendment application by the Regulatory Authority and adjourned the matter to 14.12.2021.

13
Stage 1215/11/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 20.11.2021 to allow the appellant's counsel to research case law regarding the inclusion of pending applications in court orders.

14
Stage 1321/10/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the final hearing for 15.11.2021.

15
Stage 1423/09/2021

Further Hearing

The Tribunal directed both parties to file and exchange lists of dates, events, and cited cases, and scheduled the appeal for arguments on 15.11.2021.

16
Stage 1507/05/2021

Hearing

No text available.

17
Stage 1612/04/2021

Hearing

No text available.

18
Stage 1717/03/2021

Hearing

No text available.

19
Stage 1808/02/2021

Further Consideration

The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 17.03.2021 at the request of counsel to align with another case against the same respondent and directed parties to file a list of dates and relied-upon judgments within 15 days.

20
Stage 1911/01/2021

Hearing on Appeal

No text available.

21
Stage 2005/10/2020

Hearing on Appeal

No text available.

22
Stage 21Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126001142019-18-04-2022

The Tribunal reserved judgment after hearing arguments regarding the appellant's attempt to seek a refund instead of possession and noted procedural issues concerning an unserved amendment application.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

Dismissed as not pressed Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

Dismissed as not pressed

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Kailash Prashad Pandey
  • Shailesh Kumar Srivastava

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Suchita Singh

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126001142019-18-04-2022

The Tribunal reserved judgment after hearing arguments regarding the appellant's attempt to seek a refund instead of possession and noted procedural issues concerning an unserved amendment application.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for gardenia aims developers pvt. ltd.?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →