Appellant / Complainant
Sheel Kumar Verma
Respondent
Ajnara Realtech Limited
ajnara realtech limited
₹69,650
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126001032020 by Sheel Kumar Verma against Ajnara Realtech Limited before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order, directing the respondent to pay delay interest at MCLR+1% from the promised possession date until actual possession, refund illegal Pratikar charges of Rs. 69,650, and provide all promised amenities.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal heard arguments from the appellant in person and counsel for the respondent, subsequently reserving the judgment.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to illness and provided procedural guidance to the appellant regarding the potential disengagement of their current counsel.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent a one-week extension to file an affidavit with relevant documents and directed the exchange of electronic copies between parties before the next hearing on 21.10.2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to clarify the relationship between Ajnara India Ltd. and Ajnara Realtech Ltd. and to provide documentation regarding 'Pratikar' demands raised by the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal closed the appellant's opportunity to file a replication/rejoinder due to repeated delays and failure to comply with previous cost orders, noting the need to expedite proceedings under Section 44(5) of the Act.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal noted the absence of both parties and rescheduled the appeal for a final hearing on 16.08.2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant a final opportunity to file a replication/rejoinder against the respondent's reply and scheduled the next hearing for 27.07.2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay subject to a cost of Rs. 1,000/-, directed the registry to register the case as a regular appeal, and ordered the appellant to file a replication/rejoinder.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the case due to the absence of the opposite party and scheduled it for a final hearing on 12.04.2022.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request for an adjournment to allow for the disposal of a limitation application and objections at a later date.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the case to 09.12.2021 for the disposal of a limitation application.
Delay condonation
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the defective appeal filed by Sh. Sheel Kumar Verma due to non-prosecution as no one appeared on behalf of the appellant.
For Order
The case is adjourned to 18.03.2021 due to a lawyers' strike, with a directive for the parties to exchange their pleadings in the interim.
Tribunal Order #0901126001032020-02-09-2022
The Tribunal directed the respondent to clarify the relationship between Ajnara India Ltd. and Ajnara Realtech Ltd. and to provide documentation regarding 'Pratikar' demands raised by the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority.
Tribunal Order #0901126001032020-12-04-2022
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay subject to a cost of Rs. 1,000/-, directed the registry to register the case as a regular appeal, and ordered the appellant to file a replication/rejoinder.
Tribunal Order #0901126001032020-31-05-2023
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order, directing the respondent to pay delay interest at MCLR+1% from the promised possession date until actual possession, refund illegal Pratikar charges of Rs. 69,650, and provide all promised amenities.
Tribunal Order #0901126001032020-16-08-2022
The Tribunal closed the appellant's opportunity to file a replication/rejoinder due to repeated delays and failure to comply with previous cost orders, noting the need to expedite proceedings under Section 44(5) of the Act.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order, directing the respondent to pay delay interest at MCLR+1% from the promised possession date until actual possession, refund illegal Pratikar charges of Rs. 69,650, and provide all promised amenities. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1% per annum.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order, directing the respondent to pay delay interest at MCLR+1% from the promised possession date until actual possession, refund illegal Pratikar charges of Rs. 69,650, and provide all promised amenities.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR+1% per annum
Interest Period
from 31.01.2017 till 01.05.2019
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Shailender Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Sarvesh Kumar Tiwari
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (4)
The Tribunal directed the respondent to clarify the relationship between Ajnara India Ltd. and Ajnara Realtech Ltd. and to provide documentation regarding 'Pratikar' demands raised by the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority.
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay subject to a cost of Rs. 1,000/-, directed the registry to register the case as a regular appeal, and ordered the appellant to file a replication/rejoinder.
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order, directing the respondent to pay delay interest at MCLR+1% from the promised possession date until actual possession, refund illegal Pratikar charges of Rs. 69,650, and provide all promised amenities.
The Tribunal closed the appellant's opportunity to file a replication/rejoinder due to repeated delays and failure to comply with previous cost orders, noting the need to expedite proceedings under Section 44(5) of the Act.
Need to research all rulings for ajnara realtech limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.