up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126001012025

Appellant / Complainant

Mohammad Shahid Khan

VS

Respondent

Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Yazdan Infracon Private Limited

Developer Firm

yazdan infracon private limited

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestNon-Compliance & ExecutionJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

26 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126001012025 by Mohammad Shahid Khan against Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Yazdan Infracon Private Limited before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestNon-Compliance & ExecutionJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 112/05/2026

Hearing

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the second complaint was barred by the principle of res judicata, but granted the appellant liberty to seek penal action through pending execution proceedings.

3
Stage 207/05/2026

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request from the appellant's counsel to adjourn the matter and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 12.05.2026.

4
Stage 322/04/2026

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request from the appellant's counsel to adjourn the matter, rescheduling the appeal for hearing on 07.05.2026.

5
Stage 425/03/2026

Hearing

Upon the request of the appellant's counsel, the tribunal has adjourned the appeal and scheduled it for a new hearing date on 22.04.2026.

6
Stage 523/02/2026

Hearing

Upon the request of the appellant's counsel, the tribunal has adjourned the matter and scheduled the appeal for orders/hearing on 25.03.2026.

7
Stage 603/02/2026

Hearing

The Tribunal has adjourned the matter to 23.02.2026 for orders, following a request from the learned counsel for both parties.

8
Stage 708/01/2026

Hearing

The Tribunal noted the absence of the respondent despite a stop order and directed that the case proceed ex parte against the second respondent, scheduling the next hearing for 03.02.2026.

9
Stage 803/12/2025

Hearing

The appellant's counsel requested an adjournment, and the Tribunal has rescheduled the appeal for hearing/orders on 08.01.2026.

10
Stage 913/11/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the Respondent a final ten-day extension to file objections, warning that failure to do so will result in the case proceeding ex parte.

11
Stage 1016/10/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the respondent ten additional days to file objections and scheduled the case for orders on 13.11.2025.

12
Stage 1117/09/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the Respondent 10 days to file objections and allowed a subsequent week for the filing of a rejoinder, scheduling the next hearing for October 16, 2025.

13
Stage 1201/09/2025

Defect Removal

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 17.09.2025.

14
Stage 1306/08/2025

Defect Removal

The Tribunal deemed service of notice upon the respondents sufficient following publication in newspapers and granted the respondents 10 days to file objections.

15
Stage 1423/07/2025

Defect Removal

The Tribunal has granted a request by the appellant's counsel to list the defective appeal for hearing or orders on 06.08.2025.

16
Stage 1514/07/2025

Admission

The Tribunal noted that the respondent was duly served via publication but failed to appear or file objections; consequently, the case will proceed ex parte, and the matter is listed for 23.07.2025.

17
Stage 1622/05/2025

Admission

The Tribunal directed the Registry to comply with a previous order and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 14.07.2025, while allowing the Respondent to file objections.

18
Stage 1702/05/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal directed the Registry to file a report regarding the status of the appeal to clarify a discrepancy in the 'delayed' remark and scheduled the matter for hearing on 22.05.2025.

19
Stage 1810/04/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment filed by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 02.05.2025.

20
Stage 1910/03/2025

Notice

The Tribunal noted the publication of the substituted notice and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 10.04.2025, directing the respondent to file objections in the interim.

21
Stage 2017/02/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal directed the appellant to serve notice to the respondent via publication in two daily newspapers (one Hindi, one English) due to insufficient service, with the matter listed for hearing on 10.03.2025.

22
Stage 2123/01/2025

Defect Removal

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding the appeal against the order dated 02.01.2025 and scheduled the matter for hearing on 17.02.2025, while outlining the procedural requirements for service of notice and filing of objections.

23
Stage 2221/01/2025

Defect Removal

The Tribunal noted that the appeal is pending due to the non-filing of a certified copy of the impugned order and directed the appellant to file said copy before the next hearing on 23.01.2025.

24
Stage 23Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126001012025-12-05-2026

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the second complaint was barred by the principle of res judicata, but granted the appellant liberty to seek penal action through pending execution proceedings.

25
Stage 24Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126001012025-08-01-2026

The Tribunal noted the absence of the respondent despite a stop order and directed that the case proceed ex parte against the second respondent, scheduling the next hearing for 03.02.2026.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the second complaint was barred by the principle of res judicata, but granted the appellant liberty to seek penal action through pending execution proceedings. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the second complaint was barred by the principle of res judicata, but granted the appellant liberty to seek penal action through pending execution proceedings.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 40Section 63Section 64Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Saghar Mehdi

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126001012025-12-05-2026

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the second complaint was barred by the principle of res judicata, but granted the appellant liberty to seek penal action through pending execution proceedings.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126001012025-08-01-2026

The Tribunal noted the absence of the respondent despite a stop order and directed that the case proceed ex parte against the second respondent, scheduling the next hearing for 03.02.2026.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for yazdan infracon private limited?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →