up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126001012019

Appellant / Complainant

U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad

VS

Respondent

Ram Niwas

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

13 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126001012019 by U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad against Ram Niwas before up_rera.

2
Stage 110/02/2022

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay, finding the explanation for the 353-day delay to be fictitious and concocted, and consequently dismissed the appeal.

3
Stage 223/11/2021

For Order

The Tribunal heard arguments regarding an objection against a limitation application and has reserved its judgment on the point of limitation.

4
Stage 328/09/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal directed both parties to file legal precedents regarding the point of limitation within 15 days and scheduled the case for orders on 23.11.2021.

5
Stage 429/04/2021

Delay condonation

No text available.

6
Stage 501/04/2021

Delay condonation

No text available.

7
Stage 605/03/2021

Delay condonation

The case is adjourned to 01.04.2021 due to a lawyers' strike, with a direction for parties to exchange pleadings in the interim.

8
Stage 717/02/2021

Delay condonation

No text available.

9
Stage 808/01/2021

Delay condonation

No text available.

10
Stage 908/12/2020

Delay condonation

No text available.

11
Stage 1003/11/2020

Delay condonation

No text available.

12
Stage 11Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126001012019-10-02-2022

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay, finding the explanation for the 353-day delay to be fictitious and concocted, and consequently dismissed the appeal.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay, finding the explanation for the 353-day delay to be fictitious and concocted, and consequently dismissed the appeal. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay, finding the explanation for the 353-day delay to be fictitious and concocted, and consequently dismissed the appeal.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Vijay Pratap Singh Chauhan

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Shweta Singh
  • Manoj Kumar Tripathi

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126001012019-10-02-2022

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay, finding the explanation for the 353-day delay to be fictitious and concocted, and consequently dismissed the appeal.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for a builder?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →