Appellant / Complainant
Ravi Prakash Singh
Respondent
Lucknow Development Authority
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126000892020 by Ravi Prakash Singh against Lucknow Development Authority before up_rera.
Hearing
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel despite being listed.
Hearing
Due to the absence of the appellant's counsel, the tribunal has adjourned the matter and scheduled it for orders on 09.08.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to his absence and rescheduled the hearing for May 30, 2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and adjourned the matter to 21.04.2023.
For Order
Upon the joint request of the counsels for both parties, the tribunal adjourned the appeal and scheduled it for further orders on 03.02.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for November 21, 2022.
For Order
The Tribunal directed the parties to exchange lists of dates, events, and relied-upon judgments, and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 21.10.2022.
For Order
The Tribunal directed the parties to exchange a list of dates, events, and relied-upon judgments and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 21.09.2022.
For Order
The Tribunal noted the filing of a replication/rejoinder by the appellant and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 24.08.2022.
For Order
The Tribunal directed the appellant's counsel to upload the replication/rejoinder on the e-portal and scheduled the next hearing for July 13, 2022.
For Order
The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a replication/rejoinder to the respondent's reply and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 04.05.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal directed the respondent to email its objections to the appellant within one week and ordered both parties to upload their respective filings on the e-portal before the next hearing scheduled for 28.03.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the Registry to register the miscellaneous case as a regular appeal and ordered the applicant to deposit previously imposed costs. Additionally, the respondent was directed to file physical copies of their reply on the e-Portal.
Further Order
The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit a cost amount within three days and ordered the respondent to file a reply to the grounds of appeal within one week.
Hearing
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay by imposing a cost of Rs. 1000/- and directed the respondent to file a reply before the next hearing date on 10.11.2021.
Defect Removal
The court adjourned the defective appeal due to a lawyers' strike called by the Oudh Bar Association and rescheduled the matter for 23.03.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126000892020-29-11-2021
The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit a cost amount within three days and ordered the respondent to file a reply to the grounds of appeal within one week.
Tribunal Order #0901126000892020-09-08-2023
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel despite being listed.
Tribunal Order #0901126000892020-03-01-2022
The Tribunal directed the Registry to register the miscellaneous case as a regular appeal and ordered the applicant to deposit previously imposed costs. Additionally, the respondent was directed to file physical copies of their reply on the e-Portal.
Tribunal Order #0901126000892020-20-09-2021
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay by imposing a cost of Rs. 1000/- and directed the respondent to file a reply before the next hearing date on 10.11.2021.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel despite being listed. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel despite being listed.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Vinay Pandey
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Saurabh Misra
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (4)
The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit a cost amount within three days and ordered the respondent to file a reply to the grounds of appeal within one week.
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel despite being listed.
The Tribunal directed the Registry to register the miscellaneous case as a regular appeal and ordered the applicant to deposit previously imposed costs. Additionally, the respondent was directed to file physical copies of their reply on the e-Portal.
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay by imposing a cost of Rs. 1000/- and directed the respondent to file a reply before the next hearing date on 10.11.2021.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.