up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126000892019

Appellant / Complainant

Brajendra Singh

VS

Respondent

Garv Buildtech Pvt. Ltd.

Developer Firm

garv buildtech pvt. ltd.

Disputed Amount

12,00,000

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestSale Deed & Title TransferJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

6 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126000892019 by Brajendra Singh against Garv Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestSale Deed & Title TransferJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 124/08/2021

Judgement

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the appellant sought to challenge a rectification order rather than the original substantive order, ruling that Section 39 of the Act prohibits rectifying an order by making substantive changes to its directions.

3
Stage 223/08/2021

Final Hearing

No text available.

4
Stage 309/07/2020

Final Hearing

No text available.

5
Stage 4Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126000892019-24-08-2021

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the appellant sought to challenge a rectification order rather than the original substantive order, ruling that Section 39 of the Act prohibits rectifying an order by making substantive changes to its directions.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the appellant sought to challenge a rectification order rather than the original substantive order, ruling that Section 39 of the Act prohibits rectifying an order by making substantive changes to its directions. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the appellant sought to challenge a rectification order rather than the original substantive order, ruling that Section 39 of the Act prohibits rectifying an order by making substantive changes to its directions.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 11(4)(f)Section 17Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Aynesh Rajan

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • V K Singh Bisen

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126000892019-24-08-2021

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the appellant sought to challenge a rectification order rather than the original substantive order, ruling that Section 39 of the Act prohibits rectifying an order by making substantive changes to its directions.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for garv buildtech pvt. ltd.?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →