Appellant / Complainant
Manoj Kumar Srivastava
Respondent
Lucknow Development Authority
₹25,00,000
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126000882020 by Manoj Kumar Srivastava against Lucknow Development Authority before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order that had rejected the appellant's complaint and remanded the matter back for a fresh determination of compensation due to the officer's misinterpretation of payment dates and failure to account for delayed possession without OC/CC.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal heard arguments regarding the appellant's claim for delayed interest due to late possession and an invalid offer of possession made without OC/CC; however, the judgment has been reserved.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal directed the parties to place on record the final demand raised by the Lucknow Development Authority and the allottee's request regarding the execution of the conveyance deed, with the matter listed for 27.07.2022.
Final Hearing
The matter was adjourned due to lack of time and is scheduled to be put up for hearing on 18.07.2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the hearing of Appeal-97/2020 due to lack of time and scheduled it for further hearing on 15.07.2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request from the respondent's counsel to adjourn the matter and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 14.07.2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal directed both the respondent and the appellant to exchange lists of dates and cited cases via email and scheduled the matter for hearing on 24.05.2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal noted that pleadings are complete and directed both parties to exchange and file a list of dates, events, and cited cases at least seven days before the next hearing scheduled for 20.04.2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the hearing for 20.01.2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for a final hearing on 07.01.2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to personal difficulties and rescheduled the hearing for 14.12.2021.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal due to the ill health of the appellant's counsel and scheduled the next hearing for December 9, 2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to personal difficulty and directed the parties to exchange pleadings in the interim.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final one-week extension to file objections to the grounds of appeal, stipulating that failure to do so by the next hearing will result in the forfeiture of their right to file objections.
Tribunal Order #0901126000882020-29-09-2022
The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order that had rejected the appellant's complaint and remanded the matter back for a fresh determination of compensation due to the officer's misinterpretation of payment dates and failure to account for delayed possession without OC/CC.
Tribunal Order #0901126000882020-27-07-2022
The Tribunal heard arguments regarding the appellant's claim for delayed interest due to late possession and an invalid offer of possession made without OC/CC; however, the judgment has been reserved.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order that had rejected the appellant's complaint and remanded the matter back for a fresh determination of compensation due to the officer's misinterpretation of payment dates and failure to account for delayed possession without OC/CC. Awarded in favor of Appellant.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order that had rejected the appellant's complaint and remanded the matter back for a fresh determination of compensation due to the officer's misinterpretation of payment dates and failure to account for delayed possession without OC/CC.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Abhishek Khare
- Aahuti Agarwal
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Harish Pandey
- Saurabh Misra
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order that had rejected the appellant's complaint and remanded the matter back for a fresh determination of compensation due to the officer's misinterpretation of payment dates and failure to account for delayed possession without OC/CC.
The Tribunal heard arguments regarding the appellant's claim for delayed interest due to late possession and an invalid offer of possession made without OC/CC; however, the judgment has been reserved.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.