Appellant / Complainant
Lucknow Development Authority
Respondent
Shilpi Srivastava
₹29,60,160
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126000762019 by Lucknow Development Authority against Shilpi Srivastava before up_rera.
Hearing
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Lucknow Development Authority, upholding the Regulatory Authority's order to provide the respondent with an alternate unit in the 'Sargam Apartment' project due to the abandonment of the original 'Smriti Apartment' project.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant's request to reschedule the hearing to 27.05.2025 to ensure compliance with a previous order, while explicitly noting that no further adjournments will be permitted.
Hearing
Upon the joint request of the counsel for both parties, the matter has been adjourned and listed for orders on 26.05.2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal has granted a request to list the appeal for orders or hearing on May 1, 2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 03.04.2025 upon joint request of the counsel and directed the appellant to seek instructions regarding the payment of delay interest to the respondent.
Hearing
The appeal has been adjourned at the request of the appellant's counsel and is scheduled to be listed on 10.03.2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal heard arguments regarding a dispute over interest components and alleged unfair trade practices by the Lucknow Development Authority, and subsequently adjourned the matter for further hearing on 07.02.2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request from the appellant's counsel to list the appeal for a hearing on January 7, 2025, and directed the respondent's counsel to supply a copy.
Hearing
The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 11.12.2024 following a joint request from the counsels for both parties.
Hearing
The Tribunal has granted a request to list the appeal for orders or hearing on 21.11.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment made by the counsel for the appellant and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 11.11.2024, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent's counsel seven days to seek instructions and scheduled the matter for orders on October 4, 2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to seek instructions regarding compliance with the order dated 04.04.2024 and scheduled the matter for orders on 02.08.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the absence of the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for orders/hearing to 17.05.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal ruled that the appellant's 2018 offer of possession was invalid as it was made prior to receiving the Occupancy Certificate (OC/CC), and directed the appellant to clarify actions taken regarding possession following the Regulatory Authority's 2019 order.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to personal difficulties and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 04.04.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that the appellant's counsel was out of station and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 04.03.2024.
Hearing
The court has scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 27.10.2023 following a joint request from the counsels for both parties.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant, Lucknow Development Authority, a 10-day extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for 27.07.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant, Lucknow Development Authority, 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and directed the service of a soft copy of said reply to the respondent.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 18.04.2023 due to the absence of representation for the appellant (LDA) and issued a strict directive that no further adjournments will be granted on the next date.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the case due to the absence of the respondent and scheduled the next hearing for February 1, 2023.
Part Heard
The Tribunal converted the matter from a miscellaneous case to a regular appeal and reserved the judgment for further orders.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted an application for adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for 19.05.2022.
Part Heard
The Tribunal directed the Respondent's counsel to file a physical copy of the list of dates and events in the Registry and scheduled the case for hearing on 18.04.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal directed the parties to exchange a list of dates and events and adjourned the matter to 17.01.2022 for further arguments.
Further Order
The Tribunal noted the filing of a rejoinder affidavit by the appellant and adjourned the matter to 14.12.2021 for further orders.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant permission to file a replication/rejoinder affidavit and directed the case to be listed on 22.11.2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant permission to file a replication/rejoinder affidavit in response to the respondent's reply and scheduled the next hearing for 25.10.2021.
Hearing
The case is adjourned to 18.03.2021 due to a lawyer strike, with a direction for parties to exchange their pleadings in the interim.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the applicant and directed the applicant to upload their rejoinder/replication on the e-portal and serve a copy to the respondent's counsel.
Tribunal Order #0901126000762019-27-05-2025
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Lucknow Development Authority, upholding the Regulatory Authority's order to provide the respondent with an alternate unit in the 'Sargam Apartment' project due to the abandonment of the original 'Smriti Apartment' project.
Tribunal Order #0901126000762019-04-04-2024
The Tribunal ruled that the appellant's 2018 offer of possession was invalid as it was made prior to receiving the Occupancy Certificate (OC/CC), and directed the appellant to clarify actions taken regarding possession following the Regulatory Authority's 2019 order.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Lucknow Development Authority, upholding the Regulatory Authority's order to provide the respondent with an alternate unit in the 'Sargam Apartment' project due to the abandonment of the original 'Smriti Apartment' project. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Lucknow Development Authority, upholding the Regulatory Authority's order to provide the respondent with an alternate unit in the 'Sargam Apartment' project due to the abandonment of the original 'Smriti Apartment' project.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Abhishek Khare
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Vaibhav Srivastava
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Lucknow Development Authority, upholding the Regulatory Authority's order to provide the respondent with an alternate unit in the 'Sargam Apartment' project due to the abandonment of the original 'Smriti Apartment' project.
The Tribunal ruled that the appellant's 2018 offer of possession was invalid as it was made prior to receiving the Occupancy Certificate (OC/CC), and directed the appellant to clarify actions taken regarding possession following the Regulatory Authority's 2019 order.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.