up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126000742019

Appellant / Complainant

Rajiv Saini

VS

Respondent

Aadhar Infraholding Limited

Developer Firm

aadhar infraholding limited

Disputed Amount

9,28,728

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Refund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

27 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126000742019 by Rajiv Saini against Aadhar Infraholding Limited before up_rera.

Refund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 129/05/2023

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal dismissed five appeals filed by homebuyers against M/s Aadhar Infraholding Ltd., ruling that because the project was not registered with RERA, the complaints and appeals were not maintainable under the precedent set in M/s Newtech Promoters and Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P.

3
Stage 225/05/2023

for delivery of Judgment/Order

No text available.

4
Stage 319/11/2022

Final Hearing

The Tribunal noted the absence of both parties despite prior notice and subsequently reserved judgment to be decided based on the existing pleadings and documents on record.

5
Stage 418/10/2022

Ex-Parte

The Tribunal granted an adjournment of the proceedings due to the illness of the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the ex parte hearing for 23.11.2022.

6
Stage 520/09/2022

Final Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to the illness of the appellant's counsel and scheduled an ex-parte hearing for 18.10.2022.

7
Stage 625/08/2022

Final Hearing

The Tribunal closed the respondent's opportunity to file objections and ordered the matter to proceed ex parte due to their failure to respond despite being represented by counsel.

8
Stage 729/07/2022

Final Hearing

No text available.

9
Stage 820/05/2022

Final Hearing

The Tribunal directed the respondent to file a reply to the grounds of appeal or face ex-parte proceedings and ordered both parties to exchange concise written arguments before the next hearing on 29.07.2022.

10
Stage 919/04/2022

Final Hearing

The Tribunal directed the parties to exchange lists of dates, events, and relied-upon cases before the next hearing, which is scheduled for May 20, 2022.

11
Stage 1010/03/2022

Final Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant's request for more time to present arguments and scheduled the case for a final hearing on 19.04.2022.

12
Stage 1107/01/2022

Final Hearing

The appeal is adjourned to 28.01.2022 because the appellant's counsel met with an accident and is currently bedridden.

13
Stage 1214/12/2021

Final Hearing

The Tribunal decided to proceed ex-parte against the respondent due to their failure to file objections despite repeated opportunities and granted the appellant additional time to prepare his brief, scheduling the next hearing for 07.01.2022.

14
Stage 1309/12/2021

Final Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to his unavailability and rescheduled the hearing for 14.12.2021.

15
Stage 1423/11/2021

Final Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the hearing for December 9, 2021.

16
Stage 1520/11/2021

Final Hearing

No text available.

17
Stage 1627/10/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal closed the respondent's opportunity to file objections due to repeated non-appearance and failure to file a reply since 2019, directing that the appeal be heard based on available records.

18
Stage 1715/09/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal directed the respondent to file a reply to the appeal before the next hearing and scheduled the matter for 27.10.2021.

19
Stage 1815/04/2021

Hearing

No text available.

20
Stage 1924/03/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the respondent 15 days to file a reply to the grounds of appeal and scheduled the next hearing for April 15, 2021.

21
Stage 2028/01/2021

Notice

No text available.

22
Stage 2109/09/2020

Notice

No text available.

23
Stage 22Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126000742019-29-05-2023

The Tribunal dismissed five appeals filed by homebuyers against M/s Aadhar Infraholding Ltd., ruling that because the project was not registered with RERA, the complaints and appeals were not maintainable under the precedent set in M/s Newtech Promoters and Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P.

24
Stage 23Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126000742019-14-12-2021

The Tribunal decided to proceed ex-parte against the respondent due to their failure to file objections despite repeated opportunities and granted the appellant additional time to prepare his brief, scheduling the next hearing for 07.01.2022.

25
Stage 24Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126000742019-27-10-2021

The Tribunal closed the respondent's opportunity to file objections due to repeated non-appearance and failure to file a reply since 2019, directing that the appeal be heard based on available records.

26
Stage 25Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126000742019-25-08-2022

The Tribunal closed the respondent's opportunity to file objections and ordered the matter to proceed ex parte due to their failure to respond despite being represented by counsel.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal dismissed five appeals filed by homebuyers against M/s Aadhar Infraholding Ltd., ruling that because the project was not registered with RERA, the complaints and appeals were not maintainable under the precedent set in M/s Newtech Promoters and Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal dismissed five appeals filed by homebuyers against M/s Aadhar Infraholding Ltd., ruling that because the project was not registered with RERA, the complaints and appeals were not maintainable under the precedent set in M/s Newtech Promoters and Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Prabhat Kumar Tripathi
  • Romit Seth

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Vikas Verma

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (4)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126000742019-29-05-2023

The Tribunal dismissed five appeals filed by homebuyers against M/s Aadhar Infraholding Ltd., ruling that because the project was not registered with RERA, the complaints and appeals were not maintainable under the precedent set in M/s Newtech Promoters and Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126000742019-14-12-2021

The Tribunal decided to proceed ex-parte against the respondent due to their failure to file objections despite repeated opportunities and granted the appellant additional time to prepare his brief, scheduling the next hearing for 07.01.2022.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126000742019-27-10-2021

The Tribunal closed the respondent's opportunity to file objections due to repeated non-appearance and failure to file a reply since 2019, directing that the appeal be heard based on available records.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126000742019-25-08-2022

The Tribunal closed the respondent's opportunity to file objections and ordered the matter to proceed ex parte due to their failure to respond despite being represented by counsel.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for aadhar infraholding limited?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →