Appellant / Complainant
Aditya Rana
Respondent
Meerut Development Authority
₹14,98,114
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126000712019 by Aditya Rana against Meerut Development Authority before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's orders regarding the substitution of the complainant's name and the interest for delay, ruling that the complaint was improperly filed in the name of a Power of Attorney holder rather than the actual allottee, and that the rectification order exceeded the scope of Section 39 of the Act.
Hearing
The court heard arguments from both parties and reserved the judgment for a later date.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that the appeal is ripe for hearing and scheduled the matter for a subsequent hearing on 27.02.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal has raised a preliminary issue regarding whether applications for a change of complainant name can be examined at the appellate stage and directed counsel to address this specific legal question.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to a resolution by the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh for lawyers to abstain from judicial work and rescheduled the hearing for 12.10.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal framed a substantive legal issue regarding whether Section 39 of the Act 2016 allows for the rectification of a complainant's name in a final order and directed parties to address this specific question.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and, upon joint request from both parties, adjourned the appeal for hearing to 24.08.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that the appeal is ripe for hearing and scheduled the matter to be listed for hearing on 13.07.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the Registrar to summon the records of Complaint No. 9201819999 from the Regulatory Authority to investigate a name rectification issue involving Aditya Rana and Sompal Singh Rana before making further observations.
Hearing
Upon the joint request of the learned counsels for both parties, the Tribunal has ordered the appeal to be listed for hearing.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment request made by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the case for hearing/orders on 18.04.2023.
Hearing
The court has scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 17.04.2023 following a request from counsel and confirmation that pleadings have been exchanged.
Hearing
This text represents the header/caption of an appeal filed by Aditya Rana against the Meerut Development Authority before the U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal; no substantive ruling or directive is contained in this excerpt.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal heard arguments regarding an error in the Regulatory Authority's order concerning interest for delayed possession and has reserved its judgment.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment of the appeal to 17.05.2022 after the appellant's representative requested more time due to the counsel being out of station.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 13.04.2022 for hearing due to the absence of the appellant's counsel.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the matter due to the absence of the respondent and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 12.01.2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal scheduled the appeal for a final hearing on 22.12.2021 before Division Bench No. 1.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to ensure compliance with a previous order dated 06.10.2021 and rescheduled the appeal hearing for 02.12.2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the Respondent to file the Occupancy Certificate (OC) or Completion Certificate (CC) issued by the competent authority before the next hearing date. The case involves a dispute regarding interest compensation for delay in possession of a flat.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the parties a final opportunity to file a list of dates, events, and relied-upon judgments, and scheduled the next hearing for October 6, 2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the case to 30.09.2021 following a request from the respondent's counsel due to the appellant's counsel's absence, and directed parties to submit lists of dates, events, and relied judgments in advance.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 08.04.2021 and directed the respondent to appear on the next date without fail, noting their apparent lack of interest in pursuing the case.
Hearing
The appeal was adjourned because advocates were abstaining from work due to a call by the Oudh Bar Association; the matter is listed for 18.03.2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the parties to file a list of dates, events, and relied-upon judgments within 15 days and scheduled the next hearing for February 25, 2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126000712019-09-05-2024
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's orders regarding the substitution of the complainant's name and the interest for delay, ruling that the complaint was improperly filed in the name of a Power of Attorney holder rather than the actual allottee, and that the rectification order exceeded the scope of Section 39 of the Act.
Tribunal Order #0901126000712019-24-08-2023
The Tribunal framed a substantive legal issue regarding whether Section 39 of the Act 2016 allows for the rectification of a complainant's name in a final order and directed parties to address this specific question.
Tribunal Order #0901126000712019-20-04-2023
The Tribunal directed the Registrar to summon the records of Complaint No. 9201819999 from the Regulatory Authority to investigate a name rectification issue involving Aditya Rana and Sompal Singh Rana before making further observations.
Tribunal Order #0901126000712019-16-01-2024
The Tribunal has raised a preliminary issue regarding whether applications for a change of complainant name can be examined at the appellate stage and directed counsel to address this specific legal question.
Tribunal Order #0901126000712019-06-10-2021
The Tribunal directed the Respondent to file the Occupancy Certificate (OC) or Completion Certificate (CC) issued by the competent authority before the next hearing date. The case involves a dispute regarding interest compensation for delay in possession of a flat.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's orders regarding the substitution of the complainant's name and the interest for delay, ruling that the complaint was improperly filed in the name of a Power of Attorney holder rather than the actual allottee, and that the rectification order exceeded the scope of Section 39 of the Act. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's orders regarding the substitution of the complainant's name and the interest for delay, ruling that the complaint was improperly filed in the name of a Power of Attorney holder rather than the actual allottee, and that the rectification order exceeded the scope of Section 39 of the Act.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Harish Pandey
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Ram Raj
- Rishabh Raj
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (5)
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's orders regarding the substitution of the complainant's name and the interest for delay, ruling that the complaint was improperly filed in the name of a Power of Attorney holder rather than the actual allottee, and that the rectification order exceeded the scope of Section 39 of the Act.
The Tribunal framed a substantive legal issue regarding whether Section 39 of the Act 2016 allows for the rectification of a complainant's name in a final order and directed parties to address this specific question.
The Tribunal directed the Registrar to summon the records of Complaint No. 9201819999 from the Regulatory Authority to investigate a name rectification issue involving Aditya Rana and Sompal Singh Rana before making further observations.
The Tribunal has raised a preliminary issue regarding whether applications for a change of complainant name can be examined at the appellate stage and directed counsel to address this specific legal question.
The Tribunal directed the Respondent to file the Occupancy Certificate (OC) or Completion Certificate (CC) issued by the competent authority before the next hearing date. The case involves a dispute regarding interest compensation for delay in possession of a flat.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.