Appellant / Complainant
Lucknow Development Authority
Respondent
Ved Prakash Nag
₹24,40,000
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126000572022 by Lucknow Development Authority against Ved Prakash Nag before up_rera.
Hearing
The Appellate Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the promoter is mandatorily liable to pay delay interest to the allottee from 20.08.2013 to 26.06.2018 at MCLR+1%.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that the parties are attempting an out-of-court settlement and has scheduled the appeal for further orders/hearing on 27.02.2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that the parties are attempting an amicable settlement outside of court and has adjourned the appeal for a hearing on 05.02.2025.
Hearing
Upon a joint request from both parties, the Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to be heard on 28.11.2024.
Hearing
This is a procedural order referring the parties to a previous order passed in Appeal No. 464/2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed that the matter be listed for a subsequent hearing on 15.05.2024, referring to a previous order passed in Appeal No. 464 of 2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal has granted a joint request from both parties to list Appeal-154/2022 for hearing alongside Appeal No. 464/2021 on May 3, 2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed that the appeal be listed for a hearing on 04.04.2024, referring to a previous order passed in Appeal No. 464 of 2021.
Hearing
The proceedings for Appeal-154/2022 were adjourned due to the illness of the appellant's counsel and are scheduled for hearing on 04.03.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for a hearing or order on 30.10.2023, referring to a previous order passed in Appeal No 464/2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal has scheduled Appeal-154/2022 for a hearing on 17.05.2023, to be heard alongside Appeal No. 464/2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 13.04.2023, to be heard alongside Appeal No. 464/2021.
Exchange of pleadings
The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the counsel for the appellant, Lucknow Development Authority, and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 13.01.2023.
Exchange of pleadings
The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a list of dates and events within 15 days and scheduled the next hearing for October 14, 2022.
Exchange of pleadings
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay, citing the Supreme Court's relaxation regarding the COVID-19 pandemic period, and directed the registry to register the appeal as a regular appeal.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the applicant's counsel to file a replication/rejoinder affidavit within 15 days and scheduled the case for hearing on 03.08.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the appellant to file an affidavit of service and permitted the respondent 20 days to file a reply to the appeal.
Hearing
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and established a procedural timeline for filing objections to the application for condonation of delay and the memo of appeal.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the appellant three days to remove registry defects following proof of compliance with Section 43(5) regarding deposit requirements.
Tribunal Order #0901126000572022-27-02-2025
The Appellate Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the promoter is mandatorily liable to pay delay interest to the allottee from 20.08.2013 to 26.06.2018 at MCLR+1%.
Tribunal Order #0901126000572022-03-08-2022
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay, citing the Supreme Court's relaxation regarding the COVID-19 pandemic period, and directed the registry to register the appeal as a regular appeal.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Appellate Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the promoter is mandatorily liable to pay delay interest to the allottee from 20.08.2013 to 26.06.2018 at MCLR+1%. Awarded in favor of Respondent. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1%.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Appellate Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the promoter is mandatorily liable to pay delay interest to the allottee from 20.08.2013 to 26.06.2018 at MCLR+1%.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR+1%
Interest Period
w.e.f 20.08.2013 to 26.06.2018 till the date of payment
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Amit Yadav
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Respondent In-Person
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Appellate Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the promoter is mandatorily liable to pay delay interest to the allottee from 20.08.2013 to 26.06.2018 at MCLR+1%.
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay, citing the Supreme Court's relaxation regarding the COVID-19 pandemic period, and directed the registry to register the appeal as a regular appeal.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.