up_reraStatus: Active
CASE ID: 0901126000472023

Appellant / Complainant

Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd.

VS

Respondent

Jitendra Kumar

Developer Firm

uppal chadha hi-tech developers pvt. ltd.

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

15 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126000472023 by Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd. against Jitendra Kumar before up_rera.

2
Stage 102/12/2024

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay and consequently dismissed the appeal, finding that the 290-day delay in filing was willful and lacked a satisfactory explanation.

3
Stage 201/10/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal heard arguments regarding the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal and has reserved its judgment.

4
Stage 306/09/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant a 7-day extension to file a reply to the respondents' objections and scheduled the case for orders on October 1, 2024.

5
Stage 405/08/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the defective appeal for hearing on 06.09.2024.

6
Stage 505/07/2024

Delay condonation

No text available.

7
Stage 607/05/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel on health grounds and rescheduled the defective appeal for orders/hearing on 05.07.2024.

8
Stage 705/04/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the respondent a final one-week extension to file objections and directed the applicant to file a reply within one week of receiving them, scheduling the next hearing for May 7, 2024.

9
Stage 801/03/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal has ordered the appeal to be listed for a hearing on 05.04.2024.

10
Stage 923/01/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal allowed the respondent's vakalatnama and granted them 10 days to file objections regarding the condonation of delay and grounds of appeal, scheduling the next hearing for March 1, 2024.

11
Stage 1003/01/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding an application for condonation of delay and directed the applicant to serve the appeal and application via speed-post and email.

12
Stage 1119/12/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal provisionally accepts the applicant's deposit of Rs 8,72,932/- under Section 43(5) and directs the appellant to file an application for condonation of delay within one week due to the appeal being filed after the limitation period.

13
Stage 12Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126000472023-19-12-2023

The Tribunal provisionally accepts the applicant's deposit of Rs 8,72,932/- under Section 43(5) and directs the appellant to file an application for condonation of delay within one week due to the appeal being filed after the limitation period.

14
Stage 13Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126000472023-02-12-2024

The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay and consequently dismissed the appeal, finding that the 290-day delay in filing was willful and lacked a satisfactory explanation.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay and consequently dismissed the appeal, finding that the 290-day delay in filing was willful and lacked a satisfactory explanation. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Active

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay and consequently dismissed the appeal, finding that the 290-day delay in filing was willful and lacked a satisfactory explanation.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Amit Yadav
  • Bal Kishor Verma

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Suryansh Narula

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126000472023-19-12-2023

The Tribunal provisionally accepts the applicant's deposit of Rs 8,72,932/- under Section 43(5) and directs the appellant to file an application for condonation of delay within one week due to the appeal being filed after the limitation period.

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126000472023-02-12-2024

The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay and consequently dismissed the appeal, finding that the 290-day delay in filing was willful and lacked a satisfactory explanation.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for uppal chadha hi-tech developers pvt. ltd.?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →