up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126000402023

Appellant / Complainant

U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad

VS

Respondent

Mohammed Meraj

Disposal Award

Partial

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

21 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126000402023 by U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad against Mohammed Meraj before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 103/01/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but exercised its own powers to award the respondent delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 27.08.2015 to 06.03.2018.

3
Stage 202/12/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for January 3, 2025.

4
Stage 325/10/2024

Hearing

At the request of the parties, the Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to be heard on 02.12.2024.

5
Stage 420/09/2024

For Order

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 25.10.2024.

6
Stage 514/08/2024

For Order

The court granted a request from the counsels of both parties to list the matter on 20.09.2024 for orders or hearing.

7
Stage 618/07/2024

For Order

The court granted a joint request from the counsel for both parties to adjourn the appeal and listed the matter for orders on 14.08.2024.

8
Stage 717/05/2024

For Order

No text available.

9
Stage 818/04/2024

For Order

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to his unavailability and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 17.05.2024.

10
Stage 913/03/2024

For Order

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 18.04.2024 due to the illness of the respondent's counsel.

11
Stage 1011/03/2024

For Order

The Tribunal granted a request by the appellant's counsel to list the appeal for orders or hearing on 13.03.2024.

12
Stage 1101/02/2024

For Order

The Tribunal granted the appellant a final 10-day extension to file a reply to the respondent's objection and scheduled the next hearing for March 11, 2024.

13
Stage 1202/11/2023

For Order

No text available.

14
Stage 1320/09/2023

For Order

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing/orders on 02.11.2023.

15
Stage 1402/08/2023

For Order

The Tribunal granted a 10-day extension to the appellant to file a reply to the respondent's objections and adjourned the hearing to 20.09.2023.

16
Stage 1522/05/2023

For Order

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections against the grounds of appeal and directed the appellant to file a reply within one week after receiving them. The matter is scheduled for hearing on 02.08.2023.

17
Stage 1610/04/2023

For Order

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and directed the respondent to file objections within 10 days, with the appellant permitted to reply within one week thereafter.

18
Stage 1727/02/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal condoned a one-day delay in filing the appeal and directed the Registry to convert it into a regular appeal, while outlining specific procedures for service of notice and exchange of objections.

19
Stage 18Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126000402023-27-02-2023

The Tribunal condoned a one-day delay in filing the appeal and directed the Registry to convert it into a regular appeal, while outlining specific procedures for service of notice and exchange of objections.

20
Stage 19Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126000402023-03-01-2025

The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but exercised its own powers to award the respondent delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 27.08.2015 to 06.03.2018.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but exercised its own powers to award the respondent delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 27.08.2015 to 06.03.2018. Awarded in favor of Partial. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1 percent per annum.

Disposal Winner: PartialInterest Rate: MCLR+1 percent per annumStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but exercised its own powers to award the respondent delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 27.08.2015 to 06.03.2018.

Ruling Awarded To

Partial

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR+1 percent per annum

Interest Period

w.e.f. 27.08.2015 to 06.03.2018

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Vijay Pratap Singh Chauhan
  • Akhand Pratap Singh

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Azhar Ikram
  • Manish Singh

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126000402023-27-02-2023

The Tribunal condoned a one-day delay in filing the appeal and directed the Registry to convert it into a regular appeal, while outlining specific procedures for service of notice and exchange of objections.

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126000402023-03-01-2025

The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but exercised its own powers to award the respondent delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 27.08.2015 to 06.03.2018.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for a builder?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →