Appellant / Complainant
Pradeep Garg
Respondent
Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126000352018 by Pradeep Garg against Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority before up_rera.
Hearing
The appellant requested to withdraw the appeal as the amount directed by the Regulatory Authority had already been recovered in execution proceedings. The Tribunal allowed the request and dismissed the appeal as not pressed.
Hearing
The Tribunal found that while Rs. 27,52,638 has been recovered from the builder, the funds remain pending with the Regulatory Authority and have not yet been released to the appellant; the matter is adjourned for further orders.
Rest Arg. on Merit
The Tribunal directed the Registry to verify with the Regulatory Authority whether the recovered amount of Rs. 17,23,291/- has been paid to the appellant and granted the appellant 15 days to file objections to the respondent's proof of recovery.
Tribunal Order #0901126000352018-21-09-2021
The Tribunal found that while Rs. 27,52,638 has been recovered from the builder, the funds remain pending with the Regulatory Authority and have not yet been released to the appellant; the matter is adjourned for further orders.
Tribunal Order #0901126000352018-23-10-2021
The appellant requested to withdraw the appeal as the amount directed by the Regulatory Authority had already been recovered in execution proceedings. The Tribunal allowed the request and dismissed the appeal as not pressed.
Tribunal Order #0901126000352018-24-03-2021
The Tribunal directed the Registry to verify with the Regulatory Authority whether the recovered amount of Rs. 17,23,291/- has been paid to the appellant and granted the appellant 15 days to file objections to the respondent's proof of recovery.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The appellant requested to withdraw the appeal as the amount directed by the Regulatory Authority had already been recovered in execution proceedings. The Tribunal allowed the request and dismissed the appeal as not pressed. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The appellant requested to withdraw the appeal as the amount directed by the Regulatory Authority had already been recovered in execution proceedings. The Tribunal allowed the request and dismissed the appeal as not pressed.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Abhishek Khare
- Aahuti Agarwal
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Rajesh Chadha
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The Tribunal found that while Rs. 27,52,638 has been recovered from the builder, the funds remain pending with the Regulatory Authority and have not yet been released to the appellant; the matter is adjourned for further orders.
The appellant requested to withdraw the appeal as the amount directed by the Regulatory Authority had already been recovered in execution proceedings. The Tribunal allowed the request and dismissed the appeal as not pressed.
The Tribunal directed the Registry to verify with the Regulatory Authority whether the recovered amount of Rs. 17,23,291/- has been paid to the appellant and granted the appellant 15 days to file objections to the respondent's proof of recovery.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.