up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126000342023

Appellant / Complainant

U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad

VS

Respondent

Jay Krishna Shukla

Disposal Award

Partial

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

24 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126000342023 by U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad against Jay Krishna Shukla before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 115/01/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the respondent is entitled to delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 31.08.2015 to 26.08.2017.

3
Stage 210/12/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent due to a bereavement in their family and rescheduled the hearing for 15.01.2025.

4
Stage 308/11/2024

For Order

The proceedings were adjourned following a request from the respondent's counsel, with the appeal rescheduled for hearing on 10.12.2024.

5
Stage 430/09/2024

For Order

Upon the joint request of the counsel for both parties, the matter has been adjourned and listed for orders on November 8, 2024.

6
Stage 509/09/2024

For Order

The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to the unavailability of the respondent's counsel and scheduled the matter for hearing on 30.09.2024.

7
Stage 607/08/2024

For Order

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 09.09.2024 due to the respondent's counsel being unable to attend because of illness.

8
Stage 718/07/2024

For Order

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 07.08.2024 because the respondent was unable to appear due to an injury sustained in an accident.

9
Stage 817/05/2024

For Order

No text available.

10
Stage 919/04/2024

For Order

The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment from the respondent and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 17.05.2024.

11
Stage 1028/03/2024

For Order

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent on health grounds and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 19.04.2024.

12
Stage 1121/02/2024

For Order

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to personal difficulties and rescheduled the matter for orders on 28.03.2024.

13
Stage 1229/01/2024

For Order

The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for 21.02.2024.

14
Stage 1330/10/2023

For Order

No text available.

15
Stage 1418/09/2023

For Order

The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to file an objection to the appellant's reply and scheduled the next hearing for 30.10.2023.

16
Stage 1511/09/2023

For Order

The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to a call for lawyers to abstain from judicial work by the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh and rescheduled the matter for 18.09.2023.

17
Stage 1618/07/2023

For Order

The Tribunal granted the respondent a final 10-day extension to file objections to the appeal and scheduled the matter for further orders on 11.09.2023.

18
Stage 1703/05/2023

For Order

The Tribunal granted the respondent, Jay Krishna Shukla, 10 days to file objections and scheduled the next hearing for July 18, 2023.

19
Stage 1822/03/2023

For Order

No text available.

20
Stage 1902/03/2023

For Order

The Tribunal granted the appellant one week's time to file an affidavit of service and scheduled the matter for further orders on 22.03.2023.

21
Stage 2030/01/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal condoned a one-day delay in filing the appeal because the limitation deadline fell on a Sunday and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.

22
Stage 21Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126000342023-15-01-2025

The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the respondent is entitled to delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 31.08.2015 to 26.08.2017.

23
Stage 22Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126000342023-30-01-2023

The Tribunal condoned a one-day delay in filing the appeal because the limitation deadline fell on a Sunday and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the respondent is entitled to delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 31.08.2015 to 26.08.2017. Awarded in favor of Partial. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1 percent per annum.

Disposal Winner: PartialInterest Rate: MCLR+1 percent per annumStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the respondent is entitled to delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 31.08.2015 to 26.08.2017.

Ruling Awarded To

Partial

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR+1 percent per annum

Interest Period

w.e.f. 31.08.2015 to 26.08.2017

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Vijay Pratap Singh Chauhan
  • Akhand Pratap Singh

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • J.K. Shukla

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126000342023-15-01-2025

The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the respondent is entitled to delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 31.08.2015 to 26.08.2017.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126000342023-30-01-2023

The Tribunal condoned a one-day delay in filing the appeal because the limitation deadline fell on a Sunday and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for a builder?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →