Appellant / Complainant
Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority
Respondent
Manish Agarwal
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126000292018 by Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority against Manish Agarwal before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The Appellate Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that electronic communication via email fulfills the requirement of service under Section 44(2) of the Act.
Delay condonation
The tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to illness and directed both parties to appear prepared for a final hearing on 23.10.2021.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and directed both parties to exchange pleadings and file originals with the Registry prior to the next hearing on 22.10.2021.
Hearing on Appeal
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the matter for 09.04.2021.
For Order
The appeal is adjourned due to a strike by lawyers called by the Oudh Bar Association, with the matter rescheduled for 16.03.2021.
For Order
The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and scheduled the case for hearing on the application for condonation of delay on 26.02.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126000292018-23-10-2021
The Appellate Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that electronic communication via email fulfills the requirement of service under Section 44(2) of the Act.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Appellate Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that electronic communication via email fulfills the requirement of service under Section 44(2) of the Act. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Appellate Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that electronic communication via email fulfills the requirement of service under Section 44(2) of the Act.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Rajesh Chadha
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Ashish Chaturvedi
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The Appellate Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that electronic communication via email fulfills the requirement of service under Section 44(2) of the Act.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.