up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126000242022

Appellant / Complainant

Rohit Kumar Mishra

VS

Respondent

M I Builders Private Limited

Developer Firm

m i builders private limited

Disputed Amount

72,06,998

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestSale Deed & Title TransferJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

26 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126000242022 by Rohit Kumar Mishra against M I Builders Private Limited before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestSale Deed & Title TransferJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 118/09/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the project was completed before the RERA Act's enforcement and thus not subject to its jurisdiction; however, the Tribunal issued a stern directive to the RERA Chairman to investigate the Regulatory Authority for passing a mechanical order that failed to address the complainant's specific prayer.

3
Stage 215/09/2023

Hearing

The court granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the matter for hearing on 18.09.2023.

4
Stage 327/07/2023

Hearing

No text available.

5
Stage 416/05/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to personal difficulty and scheduled the next hearing for 27.07.2023.

6
Stage 506/04/2023

Hearing

No text available.

7
Stage 601/03/2023

For Order

The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 06.04.2023 following an update from the appellant's counsel that the matter is ripe for hearing.

8
Stage 730/01/2023

For Order

The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings to 01.03.2023 and issued a warning to the respondent's counsel to formally upload adjournment applications with reasons in the future.

9
Stage 821/12/2022

For Order

The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to the absence of the respondent's counsel and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 30.01.2023.

10
Stage 928/11/2022

For Order

No text available.

11
Stage 1021/10/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to illness and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 28.11.2022.

12
Stage 1110/10/2022

Hearing

The court granted a request from both counsels for more time to seek instructions from their clients and adjourned the matter to 21.10.2022.

13
Stage 1214/09/2022

Exchange of pleadings

The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and directed the parties to submit a list of dates, events, and relied-upon judgments before the next hearing date.

14
Stage 1317/08/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a replication/rejoinder against the respondent's reply and scheduled the next hearing for 14.09.2022.

15
Stage 1405/08/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal due to the absence of the Appellant and scheduled the matter for hearing on 17.08.2022.

16
Stage 1501/08/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings to 05.08.2022 due to the illness of the appellant's counsel and noted preliminary objections raised by the respondent regarding the maintainability of the appeal.

17
Stage 1621/07/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to a medical exigency and rescheduled the hearing for August 1, 2022.

18
Stage 1730/05/2022

Hearing

No text available.

19
Stage 1816/05/2022

to file objections and its reply

The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for May 30, 2022.

20
Stage 1925/04/2022

to file objections and its reply

The Tribunal granted the respondent a two-week extension to file objections and a vakalatnama, with a warning that the matter may proceed ex parte if they fail to comply by the next hearing on 16.05.2022.

21
Stage 2001/04/2022

to file objections and its reply

The Tribunal granted the respondent two weeks to file objections to the appeal and directed both parties to upload their pleadings to the e-portal, scheduling the next hearing for 25.04.2022.

22
Stage 2109/03/2022

Defect Removal

The Tribunal ruled that the appeal was filed within the limitation period, directing the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal and issuing notice to the respondent.

23
Stage 2224/02/2022

Defect Removal

The Tribunal granted the appellant three days to rectify procedural defects, including unreadable annexures and a defective vakalatnama, and scheduled the matter for hearing on 09.03.2022.

24
Stage 23Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126000242022-18-09-2023

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the project was completed before the RERA Act's enforcement and thus not subject to its jurisdiction; however, the Tribunal issued a stern directive to the RERA Chairman to investigate the Regulatory Authority for passing a mechanical order that failed to address the complainant's specific prayer.

25
Stage 24Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126000242022-09-03-2022

The Tribunal ruled that the appeal was filed within the limitation period, directing the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal and issuing notice to the respondent.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the project was completed before the RERA Act's enforcement and thus not subject to its jurisdiction; however, the Tribunal issued a stern directive to the RERA Chairman to investigate the Regulatory Authority for passing a mechanical order that failed to address the complainant's specific prayer. Awarded in favor of Respondent. Awarded interest rate: MCLR + 1%.

Disposal Winner: RespondentInterest Rate: MCLR + 1%Status: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the project was completed before the RERA Act's enforcement and thus not subject to its jurisdiction; however, the Tribunal issued a stern directive to the RERA Chairman to investigate the Regulatory Authority for passing a mechanical order that failed to address the complainant's specific prayer.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR + 1%

Interest Period

from the date of payment made by the appellant till the date of its payment

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 11(4)(f)Section 17Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Rishi Saxena

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Manu Dixit
  • Azhar Ikram

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126000242022-18-09-2023

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the project was completed before the RERA Act's enforcement and thus not subject to its jurisdiction; however, the Tribunal issued a stern directive to the RERA Chairman to investigate the Regulatory Authority for passing a mechanical order that failed to address the complainant's specific prayer.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126000242022-09-03-2022

The Tribunal ruled that the appeal was filed within the limitation period, directing the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal and issuing notice to the respondent.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for m i builders private limited?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →