up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126000232023

Appellant / Complainant

U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad

VS

Respondent

Shashi Bala Sharma

Disposal Award

Partial

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

19 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126000232023 by U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad against Shashi Bala Sharma before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 103/01/2025

For Order

The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the respondent is entitled to delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 27.08.2015 to 18.08.2017.

3
Stage 207/08/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal heard arguments from both parties regarding legal precedents and subsequently reserved the judgment for future pronouncement.

4
Stage 318/07/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and, upon the request of counsel, adjourned the matter to be listed for hearing on 07.08.2024 along with similar appeals.

5
Stage 417/05/2024

Hearing

No text available.

6
Stage 519/04/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal noted the absence of the respondent's counsel and ordered the appeal to be listed for hearing or orders on 17.05.2024.

7
Stage 613/03/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 19.04.2024 following a joint request from the counsels for both parties.

8
Stage 707/03/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the respondent's counsel three days to prepare his brief and adjourned the appeal for hearing to 13.03.2024.

9
Stage 830/01/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal noted the appellant's counsel was on leave and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on March 7, 2024.

10
Stage 931/10/2023

Hearing

No text available.

11
Stage 1026/09/2023

Hearing

The parties informed the Tribunal that the appeal is ripe for hearing, noting its readiness for adjudication.

12
Stage 1110/08/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for September 26, 2023.

13
Stage 1230/05/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the grounds of appeal and directed that a reply be filed by the appellant within one week thereafter, scheduling the next hearing for August 10, 2023.

14
Stage 1318/04/2023

For Order

The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to file objections against the grounds of appeal and directed that a soft copy be emailed to the appellant. The case is scheduled for hearing on 30.05.2023.

15
Stage 1402/03/2023

For Order

The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to file objections and a vakalatnama, established a timeline for the appellant's reply, and scheduled the next hearing for 18.04.2023.

16
Stage 1530/01/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal condoned a one-day delay in filing the appeal because the deadline fell on a Sunday and issued notice to the respondent for March 2, 2023.

17
Stage 16Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126000232023-03-01-2025

The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the respondent is entitled to delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 27.08.2015 to 18.08.2017.

18
Stage 17Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126000232023-30-01-2023

The Tribunal condoned a one-day delay in filing the appeal because the deadline fell on a Sunday and issued notice to the respondent for March 2, 2023.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the respondent is entitled to delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 27.08.2015 to 18.08.2017. Awarded in favor of Partial. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1 percent per annum.

Disposal Winner: PartialInterest Rate: MCLR+1 percent per annumStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the respondent is entitled to delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 27.08.2015 to 18.08.2017.

Ruling Awarded To

Partial

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR+1 percent per annum

Interest Period

w.e.f. 27.08.2015 to 18.08.2017

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Vijay Pratap Singh Chauhan
  • Akhand Pratap Singh

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Pramod Mitra

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126000232023-03-01-2025

The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the respondent is entitled to delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 27.08.2015 to 18.08.2017.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126000232023-30-01-2023

The Tribunal condoned a one-day delay in filing the appeal because the deadline fell on a Sunday and issued notice to the respondent for March 2, 2023.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for a builder?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →