Appellant / Complainant
Gardenia Aims Developers Pvt. Ltd.
Respondent
Alok Goel, Anr.
gardenia aims developers pvt. ltd.
Appellant
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126000152018 by Gardenia Aims Developers Pvt. Ltd. against Alok Goel, Anr. before up_rera.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal permitted the appellant to withdraw the appeal following an amicable settlement between the parties and ordered the release of the amount deposited under Section 43(5) of the Act back to the appellant via RTGS.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted a joint request from the counsels for both parties to adjourn the matter and rescheduled the hearing to 05.01.2023.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the matter and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on December 1, 2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel, subject to a cost of Rs. 1000/-, half of which is to be deposited in the Tribunal's fund and the other half paid to the appellant's counsel.
Hearing
The Tribunal heard arguments regarding the execution of a sale deed and disputes over interest rates, subsequently listing the appeal for further hearing on 09.11.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel two days to seek instructions for a potential settlement and adjourned the matter to 10.10.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a replication/rejoinder against the respondent's reply and scheduled the next hearing for 31.08.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to provide a copy of their reply via email and bank details for cost payment, while ordering the appellant to pay costs within one week and file a replication/rejoinder before the next hearing.
For Order
The appeal was adjourned due to the absence of the appellant, with the matter rescheduled for hearing on 03.08.2022.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appellant's application for condonation of delay, subject to a cost of Rs. 25,000, and directed that the appeal be registered as a regular appeal.
For Order
The Tribunal rejected the respondent's application for the release of deposited funds because no one appeared to press the application and the appellant had not moved an application to recall the previous dismissal order.
Compliance of section 43(5)
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by M/S Gardenia Aims Developers Pvt. Ltd. due to non-compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act.
Tribunal Order #0901126000152018-24-05-2022
The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appellant's application for condonation of delay, subject to a cost of Rs. 25,000, and directed that the appeal be registered as a regular appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126000152018-27-04-2023
The Tribunal permitted the appellant to withdraw the appeal following an amicable settlement between the parties and ordered the release of the amount deposited under Section 43(5) of the Act back to the appellant via RTGS.
Tribunal Order #0901126000152018-09-11-2022
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel, subject to a cost of Rs. 1000/-, half of which is to be deposited in the Tribunal's fund and the other half paid to the appellant's counsel.
Tribunal Order #0901126000152018-03-08-2022
The Tribunal directed the respondent to provide a copy of their reply via email and bank details for cost payment, while ordering the appellant to pay costs within one week and file a replication/rejoinder before the next hearing.
Tribunal Order #0901126000152018-28-01-2021
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by M/S Gardenia Aims Developers Pvt. Ltd. due to non-compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal permitted the appellant to withdraw the appeal following an amicable settlement between the parties and ordered the release of the amount deposited under Section 43(5) of the Act back to the appellant via RTGS. Awarded in favor of Appellant.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal permitted the appellant to withdraw the appeal following an amicable settlement between the parties and ordered the release of the amount deposited under Section 43(5) of the Act back to the appellant via RTGS.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Suchita Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Vishal Agarwal
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (5)
The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appellant's application for condonation of delay, subject to a cost of Rs. 25,000, and directed that the appeal be registered as a regular appeal.
The Tribunal permitted the appellant to withdraw the appeal following an amicable settlement between the parties and ordered the release of the amount deposited under Section 43(5) of the Act back to the appellant via RTGS.
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel, subject to a cost of Rs. 1000/-, half of which is to be deposited in the Tribunal's fund and the other half paid to the appellant's counsel.
The Tribunal directed the respondent to provide a copy of their reply via email and bank details for cost payment, while ordering the appellant to pay costs within one week and file a replication/rejoinder before the next hearing.
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by M/S Gardenia Aims Developers Pvt. Ltd. due to non-compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act.
Need to research all rulings for gardenia aims developers pvt. ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.