Appellant / Complainant
Ifci Infrastructure Development Lid.
Respondent
Jitendra Kumar
ifci infrastructure development lid.
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126000092019 by Ifci Infrastructure Development Lid. against Jitendra Kumar before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order dated 03.09.2019, ruling that the authority exceeded its jurisdiction under Section 39 of the Act 2016 by performing a substantive review rather than merely rectifying a clerical error.
Hearing
The appellant challenges the Regulatory Authority's order under Section 39 of the Act 2016, arguing that the authority exceeded its jurisdiction by modifying an interest rate rather than merely correcting clerical errors. The Tribunal has heard arguments from both parties and reserved judgment.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to the absence of the respondent's counsel and a scheduling conflict for the appellant's counsel, rescheduling the hearing for 27.02.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 27.10.2023 following a joint request from the counsels for both parties.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 27.07.2023.
Hearing
Due to the departure of the previous Presiding Member, the appeal is scheduled for a fresh hearing on 06.04.2023 following a joint request from both counsels.
Arguments
The Tribunal heard arguments from both parties and reserved the judgment, while allowing counsel to file written submissions along with cited case law.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that the list of dates and events has been filed by the parties and scheduled the appeal for arguments on 25.11.2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal due to the non-appearance of the appellant and scheduled the next hearing for October 6, 2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted one day's time for the respondent to file objections regarding the appellant's interim application for a stay on recovery proceedings and listed the matter for 16.03.2021.
Hearing on Appeal
The Tribunal directed the counsels for both parties to file a list of dates, events, and relied-upon judgments on the e-portal and in physical copy within 15 days, and scheduled the next hearing for March 15, 2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126000092019-07-05-2024
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order dated 03.09.2019, ruling that the authority exceeded its jurisdiction under Section 39 of the Act 2016 by performing a substantive review rather than merely rectifying a clerical error.
Tribunal Order #0901126000092019-27-02-2024
The appellant challenges the Regulatory Authority's order under Section 39 of the Act 2016, arguing that the authority exceeded its jurisdiction by modifying an interest rate rather than merely correcting clerical errors. The Tribunal has heard arguments from both parties and reserved judgment.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order dated 03.09.2019, ruling that the authority exceeded its jurisdiction under Section 39 of the Act 2016 by performing a substantive review rather than merely rectifying a clerical error. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1% per annum simple.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order dated 03.09.2019, ruling that the authority exceeded its jurisdiction under Section 39 of the Act 2016 by performing a substantive review rather than merely rectifying a clerical error.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR+1% per annum simple
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Siddharth Vikram Asthana
- Anoop Kumar Asthana
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Saurabh Misra
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order dated 03.09.2019, ruling that the authority exceeded its jurisdiction under Section 39 of the Act 2016 by performing a substantive review rather than merely rectifying a clerical error.
The appellant challenges the Regulatory Authority's order under Section 39 of the Act 2016, arguing that the authority exceeded its jurisdiction by modifying an interest rate rather than merely correcting clerical errors. The Tribunal has heard arguments from both parties and reserved judgment.
Need to research all rulings for ifci infrastructure development lid.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.